RE: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] sessionGroupID

["Tamari, Yossi" <yossi.tamari@sap.com>]

Just to clear up: what I meant was that we should decrease the strength from SHOULD to MAY, not increase it to MUST. I may have not stated this clearly...

	Yossi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:47 AM
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org; wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] sessionGroupID


I would even say "CAN", as whether the Producer does this or not is of no
concern to the Producer. But I do agree with Yossi that this is information
that can be supplied in the Metadata (i.e. whether  sessionGroupId
functionality is supported by the Producer).

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Mon, July 15, 2002 21:16
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org; wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] sessionGroupID



The question here is the difference between preferred (MAY) and strongly
encouraged behaviour (SHOULD). Since there is semantics involved in
specifying this data item, I prefer using SHOULD over MAY (but don't think
it is worthy of a MUST!).



 

                      "Tamari, Yossi"

                      <yossi.tamari@sap        To:
wsia@lists.oasis-open.org,                                 
                      .com>
wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org                                
                                               cc:

                      07/15/2002 12:47         Subject:  RE:
[wsia][wsrp-interfaces] Refactoring the data objects   
                      PM

 

 





See my comments marked with [YT].
(Most of them are in appendix A, since it seems appendix a is the real
definition of the spec, which I think is wrong, and is a result of what
Rich mentioned below about the obscurity of the interface.)

The endless debate about putting WSIA concepts in the WSRP standard is
still there...

      Yossi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:09 PM
To: wsia@lists.oasis-open.org; wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsia][wsrp-interfaces] Refactoring the data objects


As requested in Tuesday's Joint interfaces call, I have reworked the draft
spec in an effort to factor the data items into the scopes presented at the
June F2F. Personally I think this obscures too much and that some of the
data items should move up to first class parameters in the interface.
Hopefully this version can provide a reasonable basis for a discussion of
which items should be promoted either for clarity or as part of supporting
any factoring of the operations.

Technical note: In order to make this readable but yet leave an indication
of what was modified, I accepted the changes and then appended a space on
the end of changed lines so that a change bar will appear on the left. So
much changed in Appendix A that it all should be considered modified.

(See attached file: WSIA - WSRP Interface Specification.doc)




#### WSIA - WSRP Interface Specification1.doc has been removed from this
note on July 15 2002 by Rich Thompson





----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>