[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [wsrp-interfaces] Re: [wsrp-wsia] [wsrp][interfaces] Portletmode/Window state types
Then we might want to represent them as strings as well, and be it only for
compatability.
Best regards
Carsten Leue
-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401
|---------+----------------------------->
| | Michael Freedman |
| | <Michael.Freedman@|
| | oracle.com> |
| | |
| | 08/09/2002 01:06 |
| | AM |
|---------+----------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: interfaces <wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org>, wsrp-wsia <wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org> |
| cc: |
| Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [wsrp][interfaces] Portlet mode/Window state types |
| |
| |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
In todays conference call we asked whether the current representation of
window states and portlet modes as bit vectors would adequately support
extensibility. After a little discussion we tabled the question pending
information concerning how JSR 168 deals with this.
JSR 168 essentially represents these as Strings (wrapped by objects for
good OO).
I propose we do the same.
-Mike-
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC