[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-interfaces] Groups - Security.html uploaded
Should a use case explicitly call out the need for authenticated secure registration? e.g. An admin (X) at consumer site A registers with producer B.
She (Admin X) creates a portlet and later grants (delegates to) user Y the right to access that portlet under roles I,J & K (least privilege may imply other roles allowed for X).
We should definitely mention SAML as it claims to enable portable trust (and is an OASIS standard).
regards,
Andre
-----Original Message-----
From: richt2@us.ibm.com [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 23 February 2004 19:27
To: wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-interfaces] Groups - Security.html uploaded
The document Security.html has been submitted by Rich Thompson (richt2@us.ibm.com) to the WSRP Interfaces SC document repository.
Document Description:
Initial draft
Download Document:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-interfaces/download.php/5622/Security.html
View Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-interfaces/document.php?document_id=5622
PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application
may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste
the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]