Re: [wsrp] Re: [wsrp-interfaces] Issue with current CachableResourceproposal

[Richard Jacob <richard.jacob@de.ibm.com>]

can you explain what you mean by enforcement?
I seem to miss context here. The parameter only influences consumer URL
rewriting and what's on the resource URL sent to the browser.

Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,

        Richard Jacob
______________________________________________________
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept. 2289, WebSphere Portal Server Development 1
WSRP Team Lead
WSRP Architecture & Standardization
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469  -  Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888

IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Johann Weihen
Geschäftsführung: Herbert Kircher
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294


                                                                       
             Michael Freedman                                          
             <michael.freedman                                         
             @oracle.com>                                               To
                                       Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
             03/14/07 11:39 PM                                          cc
                                       WSRP Interfaces subgroup        
                                       <wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-open.o
                                       rg>, wsrp                       
                                       <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>     
                                                                   Subject
                                       [wsrp] Re: [wsrp-interfaces] Issue
                                       with current CachableResource   
                                       proposal                        
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       




I am for adding it -- also copying the wsrp list in case anyone isn't on
this one.
    -Mike-

Rich Thompson wrote:

      I think it is a good idea to enable those Producers who can and are
      willing to enforce the restrictions.

      Any objections to adding this field prior to the inclusion of the
      proposal into the draft?

      Rich

                                                                       
 Stefan Hepper                                                         
 <sthepper@hursley.ibm.com>                                            
                                                                       
                                                                        To
 03/14/2007 12:02 PM                      WSRP Interfaces subgroup     
                                          <wsrp-interfaces@lists.oasis-ope
                                          n.org>                       
                                                                        cc
                                                                       
                                                                   Subject
                                          [wsrp-interfaces] Issue with 
                                          current CachableResource     
                                          proposal                     
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       





      While discussing in the JSR 286 EG how the producer may enforce the
      restrictions mentioned for the type FULL and PORTLET we noticed that
      the
      producer does not get any information back on a serve resource call
      about the cachability setting.
      Therefore I propose to add the following on the ResourceParams type:
      [O] string resourceCachability

      providing the resourceCachability value set on the resource URL that
      triggered this getResource call. If this value is missing the default
      is
      that the cachability of the getResource call is of type PAGE.

      Stefan