[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-interop] switch to 1.0
I agree with Andre,
the changes aren't that big anyway.
The biggest - and maybe therefor also the most important part to test - is
the chaged rewriting/namespacing.
On the WSDL side we didn't change much, there are the faults and the
PortletStateChange flag in InteractionParams (just a rename).
Any other important semantical changes I missed?
So I would give it a try and start with WSDL 1.0 with new rewrite-URL rules
and then patch if we find more bugs.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,
Richard Jacob
______________________________________________________
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Andre Kramer |
| | <andre.kramer@eu.|
| | citrix.com> |
| | |
| | 07/02/2003 09:36 |
| | AM |
|---------+---------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: wsrp-interop@lists.oasis-open.org |
| cc: |
| Subject: RE: [wsrp-interop] switch to 1.0 |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I would not want to test an incomplete 1.0 (e.g. 1.0 WSDL but old re-write
rules).
regards,
Andre
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Freedman [mailto:Michael.Freedman@oracle.com]
Sent: 02 July 2003 01:46
To: Rich Thompson
Cc: wsrp-interop@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsrp-interop] switch to 1.0
Yes, but I also think it will be useful/good if there is
interoperability between the first set of JSR 168/WSRP containers
that show up. So, I think its useful for us to agree on what this
specific function is .95, 1.0, 1.0 WSDL but minus functional changes
such as URL rewrite. I think in answering this question we should
not only ask when folks can complete their implementations, but also
when can they get them published for interop testing and perform the
interop tests [and fix the problems]. We can then weigh this date
against specific companies intent/need to publish a JSR 168 container
at a specific time. For basically I think we should work hard to
communicate and demonstrate JSR 168 interoperate using remote
portlets -- if the frist experience folks have with JSR 168 is that
it doesn't interoperate it could be damaging.
-Mike-
Rich Thompson wrote:
I would think that moving to the 1.0 WSDL as soon as is
reasonable is the best plan. The 0.95 level of interoperability
was useful testing (both of the spec and the implementations),
but it is much more important thing to achieve at least the
equivalent at the 1.0 level. I doubt that the short duration of
some things being broken during the time of people upgrading
their implementations will have a significant impact.
Rich Thompson
Michael Freedman
<Michael.Freedman@oracle.com> To: Richard Jacob
<richard.jacob@de.ibm.com>
cc:
07/01/2003 08:15 PM wsrp-interop@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re:
[wsrp-interop] switch to 1.0
Its easy for us to upgrade to the 1.0 WSDL. Its a little more
work to
support the modified URL/namespacing semantics. Which has more
value
for folks, quickly upgrading to 1.0 WSDL [compatibility] or
fully
upgrading to 1.0 semantics? In either case as a number of us
may be
preparing WSRP/JSR 168 containers for publication asap once JSR
168 goes
public we should probably coordinate/agree on a WSRP version
for such
implementations so there is some interoperability when the
public gets a
hold of things. On the conservative side one would suggest the
.95
versions we have been testing/working with fior the past month.
The
downside of this is upgrading the public [en mass] once we all
switch
over to 1.0. The risk in going to 1.0 between now and next week
is that
our current interoperability will break. What do folks think?
-Mike-
Richard Jacob wrote:
>Since 1.0 is now out, I wanted to raise the question when do
people think
>we should switch our interop testing to 1.0?
>Do you have plans to update your implementations to 1.0 soon?
>We (IBM) plan to update as soon as possible, and hope to be
able to switch
>our producer to 1.0 maybe end of this week.
>
>Any other opinions, comments, suggestions?
>
>Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,
>
> Richard Jacob
>______________________________________________________
>IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
>Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
>Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
>Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com
>
>
>You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-interop/members/leave_workgroup.php
>
>
>
You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-interop/members/leave_workgroup.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]