OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp-interop message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Fw: Fault Messages



Forwarding private comments for basis of references.

Rich Thompson

----- Forwarded by Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM on 07/09/2003 03:10 PM -----
Stephan Laertz@IBMDE

05/22/2003 10:36 AM


        To:        David Ward <david.ward@oracle.com>
        cc:        Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>, Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
        From:        Stephan Laertz/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
        Subject:        Re: Fault MessagesLink


The specific codes from the spec do not have a dot in their names. Only the accumulation of spefic code scoped by the top level code.

But since this a potential for confusions we could state something like that

2) The  SOAP faultcode SHOULD be set to the WSRP specific code scoped by the top level code being raised, namespace  qualified to be in the "urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types" namespace.


MfG / Best regards,

Stephan Laertz

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
WebSphere Portal Server Development

IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen
Phone: +49 7031 16-3313 (*120 3313)
Email: Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------



David Ward <david.ward@oracle.com>

22.05.2003 16:04

       
        To:        Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>
        cc:        Stephan Laertz/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
        Subject:        Re: Fault Messages

       



RWould you consider giving a concrete example for 2) e.g. <faultcode xmlns:types="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types">types:Interface.InvalidCookie</faultcode>?

Also, I think the last sentence of 3) is confusing, as the fault "codes" have dots in them, but the WSDL element names don't.

Regards

Dave

Andre Kramer wrote:
Yes, I  believe that maximizes interoperability. We should still verify this by testing,  but here is a recap of the suggested spec errata / enhancements. With  JAX-RPC bug fixing, we can relax the "MUST be the only content" and ensure the  "fault code SHOULD be set to".
 
    Chapter 13
 
    1) P76 / 4
    old text: WSDL defines fault codes to be strings using "." as  a delimiter to scope the error codes.
    new text: This spec defines fault codes to be strings  using "." as a delimiter to scope the error codes.
 
    2) P74 before table
    new text:
    The  SOAP faultcode SHOULD be set to the WSRP error code being raised, namespace  qualified to be in the "urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types" namespace.
 
    3) P74 after (2)
    new text:
    The SOAP fault's detail MUST contain the corresponding namespaced fault element from the WSRP v1 WSDL. In order to maximize  interoperability, this element MUST be the only content in the fault detail  element. Note that the WSRP WSDL's fault element names are the specific codes  from the following table with "Fault" appended.
 
regards,
Andre

-----Original Message-----
From: David  Ward [mailto:david.ward@oracle.com]
Sent: 22 May 2003  14:14
To: Andre Kramer
Cc: 'Stephan Laertz'; 'Richard  Jacob'
Subject: Re: Fault Messages


So the detail part is going to be a MUST (must contain the correctly namespaced element and nothing else) and the faultcode part is going    to be a SHOULD, meaning that ideally we should    have

<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ns0="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types">
         <env:Body>
            <env:Fault xsi:type="env:Fault">
               <faultcode>ns0:Interface.InvalidCookie</faultcode>      
               <faultstring>a meaningful    description</faultstring>
               <detail>
                  <ns0:InvalidCookieFault/>
               </detail>
            </env:Fault>
         </env:Body>
   </env:Envelope>

but we can    get away with:

<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ns0="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types">
         <env:Body>
            <env:Fault    xsi:type="env:Fault">
               <faultcode>env:Server</faultcode>
               <faultstring>oracle.webdb.wsrp.InvalidCookie</faultstring>
               <detail>
                  <ns0:InvalidCookieFault/>
               </detail>
            </env:Fault>
         </env:Body>
      </env:Envelope>

Correct?

Regards

Dave

Andre    Kramer wrote:
I      just went back to the wsdl and the fault *element* is actually called      InitCookieFault. Both the fault's complexType and element end in "Fault" and      the message part references the element, so I was wrong!  It is      probably better not to make an wsdl changes at this stage so let's go with      <detail>      <xyz:InvalidCookieFault/></detail>?
 
regards,
Andre
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephan Laertz [mailto:Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com]
Sent:        22 May 2003 13:21
To: Andre Kramer
Cc: Andre Kramer;        'David Ward'; 'Richard Jacob'
Subject: RE: Fault        Messages



I managed to        produce fault messages like this.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
 <soapenv:Body>    
  <soapenv:Fault>  
   <faultcode        xmlns:ns1="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types">ns1:Security.InvalidRegistration</faultcode>
   <faultstring>Consumer   supplies a registrationHandle/registrationState pair that is not    recognized by the Producer.</faultstring>
   <detail>
    <ns2:InvalidRegistration xmlns:ns2="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types"/>
   </detail>
  </soapenv:Fault>
 </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

But without renaming, in particular omitting the        suffix "Fault " from the name of the fault types in the schema definition        Axis will not deserialize the exception since it seems that axis relies        on
the first detail child element   for deserializing.


MfG /        Best regards,

Stephan        Laertz

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
WebSphere        Portal Server Development

IBM Deutschland Entwicklung        GmbH
Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen
Phone: +49 7031 16-3313        (*120 3313)
Email: Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------



Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>

22.05.2003 13:21
                     
                     To:        Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>, Stephan Laertz/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
        cc:                "'David Ward'" <david.ward@oracle.com>,   Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
        Subject:           RE: Fault Messages

              





Below is the fault that I now create and catch with .NET. If        this is OK with us all, we should get an errata (more an interop        clarification) into the spec and try it with the IBM producer?

regards,

Andre

<?xml        version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
  <soap:Body>
    <soap:Fault>
      <faultcode        xmlns:q0="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types">q0:Interface.InvalidCookie</faultcode>
             <faultstring>System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: NETlets
   at        NETlet.NETletServer.MarkupServer.getMarkup(getMarkup getMarkup1,        HttpContext Context, HttpSessionState Session) in     c:\inetpub\wwwroot\netlets\netletserver.cs:line 1447
   at        NETlet.NETletService.WSRP_v1_Markup_Binding_SOAP.getMarkup(getMarkup getMarkup1) in C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\NETlets\NETletsService.cs:line   89</faultstring>
                    <faultactor>urn:citrix.com/netlets</faultactor>
      <detail>        
        <InvalidCookie        xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types" />
      </detail>
    </soap:Fault>
  </soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>

-----Original Message-----
From:        Andre Kramer  
Sent: 22 May 2003        11:58
To: 'Stephan Laertz'; Andre         Kramer
Cc: David Ward; Richard        Jacob
Subject: RE: Fault         Messages


So  that explains the        "Fault" ending on the trace you provided! I was going to  come back        to that... This is a bug and should be reported to  Axis?        
 
Is  it possible to        just create a generic SOAP Fault and add a detail node by  hand?        i.e. not using the fault class generated from the  wsdl.        
 

    --        Andre
 
 -----Original  Message-----
From: Stephan Laertz  [mailto:Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com]
Sent: 22 May 2003  11:44
To: Andre Kramer
Cc: David        Ward; Richard  Jacob
Subject: RE:        Fault Messages


I haven't found a way to         generate fault messages according to your approach with        Axis.  

I have no        problem to handle with  namespaced and scoped fault        codes.
But per default Axis        always adds an element wich is called after the  fault type e,g.        <ns2:InvalidRegistrationFault  xmlns:ns2="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types"/> to the detail    element.
This means I        can only have  a detail element with the first child element named        after the type and at  least one other child element which can be any        other element I create  
(e.g. <ns2:InvalidRegistration         xmlns:ns2="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types"/>).
Our consumer relies on the first detail        element named  after the type.        




MfG  / Best regards,        

Stephan  Laertz

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
WebSphere  Portal Server Development      

IBM Deutschland Entwicklung  GmbH        
Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen
Phone: +49 7031 16-3313  (*120 3313)
Email:  Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  



Andre Kramer  <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>  

22.05.2003              10:32
                      
         To:                     Stephan Laertz/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, David               Ward <david.ward@oracle.com>,   Andre Kramer  <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>
        cc:                      Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, Richard  Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE      
         Subject:                     RE: Fault  Messages

                     




I   think this unfortunately satifies neither Dave or I        fully.  
         
My  approach was to  define fault codes        in our own (wsrp) namespace. This seems to  have  become        confused with soap's custom fault codes. In particular both use a          ".". I now think that this is a SHOULD. i.e. the fault         code SHOULD be set  to the values in Section 13. The        mention of  WSDL in section 13 is wrong, but I  would still use        the "." to scope  our (namespaced) fault/error  codes.
         
I also  worry that the  <detail>        content model is too vague. We should make the  messages         conform to a strict pattern. Especially for faults like        InvalidCookie   that we need specific handlers for. My thinking        is to add a MUST  for  interoperability: InvalidCookie and        InvalidSession faults MUST  contain only one  element and this        must be called InvalidCookie or  Invalid Session (respectively)  and MUST be qualified with the         "urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types"  namespace.
 
I'm         going to spend some time  this morning checking that I can        generate appropriate  fault details in  .NET. Could you and Dave        see if we can meet the above SHOULDs  and  MUSTs?
 
regards,
Andre

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Stephan Laertz         [mailto:Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com]
Sent: 22  May 2003         08:37
To: David        Ward; Andre  Kramer
Cc: Richard Jacob;  Richard  Jacob
Subject: Fault Messages  



Hello

summing up the WS-I statements        regarding fault  messages, I  suggest to handle with fault        message like below.   

R1000 When a   MESSAGE contains a soap:Fault  element, that element MUST NOT  have element        children other than  faultcode, faultstring,   faultactor        and detail.  
> We do  not have        any other  elements.

R1002 A RECEIVER MUST accept fault messages that         have  any number of elements, including zero, appearing as        children of  the  detail element. Such children can be qualified or   unqualified.
> We should not         fail  if the <detail> element has any number of children        elements.   

R1003 A  RECEIVER  MUST accept fault messages that have any number of qualified   attributes,        including zero, appearing on the detail element. The  namespace of        such attributes can be anything other  than  "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/".

R1031 When a MESSAGE        contains a  faultcode  element the content of that element        SHOULD  NOT use of the SOAP 1.1  "dot" notation to refine the        meaning of the Fault.    
It is        recommended that  applications that require  custom fault codes        either use the SOAP1.1 defined  fault codes and  supply        additional information in the detail element, or that  they  define these codes in a namespace that is controlled by the      specifying   authority.
> We should        not use   faultcodes with "dot" notation like        Interface.InvalidCookie. Instead  use  faultcodes that are        namespaced.

Since  they recommend using        the detail element and most stacks use the  detail          element to deserialize exceptions we should additionaly        provide   the detail element, but allow any number of childrens.         
What I suggest is to provide both options :         

               a)    provide namespaced        faultcodes  
               b)  have a detail  element  

Example:

<?xml version="1.0"        encoding="UTF-8"?>   
<soapenv:Envelope   xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"   xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"   xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
 <soapenv:Body>
  <soapenv:Fault>
   <faultcode          xmlns:ns1="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types">ns1:InvalidRegistrationFault</faultcode>  
            <faultstring>RegistrationHandle   &apos;192.168.0.3_1053551289072_0&apos; invalid on      this   producer</faultstring>        
    <detail>  
            <ns2:InvalidRegistrationFault        xmlns:ns2="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types"/>  
           <string>RegistrationHandle         &apos;192.168.0.3_1053551289072_0&apos; invalid on        this   producer</string>        
    </detail>  
          </soapenv:Fault>
 </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

MfG / Best regards,

Stephan  Laertz

--------------------------------------------------------------------------  
WebSphere  Portal Server        Development  

IBM        Deutschland Entwicklung  GmbH
Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen        
Phone: +49 7031 16-3313  (*120        3313)
Email:         Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------  



David Ward   <david.ward@oracle.com>   

21.05.2003              18:54
                      
        To:                       David Ward  <david.ward@oracle.com>
        cc:                       Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>, Stephan   Laertz/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, Peter              Fischer3/Germany/IBM@IBMDE,  Richard               Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE  
         Subject:                      Re: IBM  producer  

                      



If  we're going to  start quoting WS-I, here's some ammunition to          back up my case. It only suggests custom namespaced faultcodes as an   alternative to using the detail element and recommends    using the  detail  element.

4.1.6        SOAP Custom Fault   Codes

SOAP        1.1 allows custom fault  codes to  appear                                                          inside         the faultcode element,                                                            through  the        use of the "dot" notation.                                                          

Use of   this mechanism to extend the meaning of                                                           the SOAP 1.1-defined fault  codes can lead to                                                                  namespace  collision. Therefore, its use should be                                                                  avoided, as doing so may cause interoperability         issues                                                          when the  same  names are used in the       right-hand side of       &! nbsp;                          &nbs! p;                        the "." (d! ot) to         convey different  meaning.                                                                   

                                                            Instead, the        Profile encourages the use of the                                                            fault          codes defined in SOAP 1.1, along with                                                                  additional information in  the detail                                                                  element to convey the nature  of the Fault.                                         &nbs! p;                             !    

Alternatively, it  is  acceptable                                                           to        define custom fault codes in a namespace                                                           controlled by         the specifying authority.                                                          

A number of  specifications have already                                                               defined custom fault codes. Despite                                                            this, their        use  in future specifications is                                                           discouraged.         

Regards  

Dave  

David Ward wrote:          
Another question below....

Andre   Kramer wrote:
RE: IBM        producer  

David,        

I believe any  valid xml can go into the        detail so you  may  have an JAX-RPC  bug.

But,          

Peter  & Stephan:        

a) I  expected the wsrp exception        name to be  carried in the fault code (i.e.  in        <faultcode> not  <exceptionName>)!         

e.g.  using:         
                                          AxisFault f =  new InvalidCookieFault();  
                                          f.   setFaultCode( new        QName("urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types",    "Interface.InvalidVookieFault"));         

                                          throw   f;

b) I expect the   "Interfaces." or "Security." "Top Level"  (chapter 13) as well as  the  "Specific Code"        (separated by a '.') in the fault   code.        
JAX-RPC provides no  control over the QName       used as the fault code -  it's          always soapenv:Server. Is this a mandatory part of the        spec,   and if so, why?  Won't most stacks deserialize the        exception  using the  typing of the contents  of        <detail>?  

I'll try and catch a        fault once you have updated  the   producer.

regards,        
Andre

-----Original  Message-----
From: David Ward  mailto:david.ward@oracle.com]
Sent: 21 May 2003          15:07
To: Stephan          Laertz
Cc: Andre        Kramer;  Peter  Fischer3; Richard Jacob        
Subject:  Re: IBM producer  

We still have  a problem        handling your  fault messages.  This is what the    
InvalidCookieFault generated        by your  producer  looks like:        

    <soapenv:Envelope           
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"  
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"  
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
      <soapenv:Body>  
                  <soapenv:Fault>            
                     <faultcode>soapenv:Server.generalException</faultcode>     
                     <faultstring>Timeout of HTTP-session.  Consumer        needs to    
invoke initCookie()   again.</faultstring> 
                     <detail>            
                        <ns1:InvalidCookieFault          
xmlns:ns1="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v1:types"/>     
                        <ns2:exceptionName          
xmlns:ns2="http://xml.apache.org/axis/">oasis.names.tc.wsrp.v1.types.InvalidCookieFault</ns2:exceptionName>      

                     </detail>  
                  </soapenv:Fault>
      </soapenv:Body>
            </soapenv:Envelope>        

Our  problem is the exceptionName element        - our serializers   don't expect   
it so it trips them up.  Does        the WSDL allow this?

Thanks  

David

Stephan        Laertz  wrote:

>
> I'm glad it         finally works.
> The        only  difference between the two  display portlets  is the        fact that     
> they have  different portlet sessions. Besides that          they are the  same
>  
> MfG /        Best  regards,  
>  
>        Stephan Laertz  
>
>          --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WebSphere Portal Server          Development
>
> IBM        Deutschland  Entwicklung  GmbH        
>  Schoenaicher Str. 220,  71032        Boeblingen  
> Phone:        +49  7031 16-3313 (*120  3313)        
>  Email:  Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com          
>          ---------------------------------------------------------------------------    
>  
>  
>
>
> David Ward  <david.ward@oracle.com>          
>        
>  21.05.2003 12:46      
>
>          
>                  To:        Stephan          Laertz/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
>                  cc:        Andre Kramer     <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>,           Richard  
>   Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, Peter        Fischer3/Germany/IBM@IBMDE  
>                  Subject:        Re: IBM       producer
>  
>          
>           
>
>
>
> It seems to be working well now. The         date  portlet seems to change the           
> cartoons displayed in the display        portlet and  the action links           
> increment portlet and  application        counters. Is there   any difference          
>  between the two display         portlets?
>  
> Here's         what it looks like on Oracle  Portal....         
>
> Screenshot  
>
>          Regards
>  
>        David  
>
> Stephan Laertz         wrote:
>  
>  Hello,
>          
> I have fixed most  of the problems and it     works correctly  with our          
> consumer  implementation.  
>        
> But still we have a setup problem on our      interop machine   that keeps          
> the  portlet from connecting to the        dilbert site.              
> For now I've  enabled  the local        mode for portlet 0.2  and 0.3. This          
> means that clicking a date in the          date portlet won't  change        
> the picture displayed by the other        portlets.     
>
>          David, I could not verify that our producer always  sends        a  session   
>  context with new ID.  It does always send a session         context but  keeping          
> the ID  of          
> the established  session. Even though I      have not  testet  HTTP/1.1 with           
> keep-alive I  wouldn't be surprised if       it doesn't work  since  we use           
> Axis as SOAP   stack.
>          
> Best regards,          
>  
>  Stephan Laertz  
>
>          --------------------------------------------------------------------------    
>  
>        WebSphere Portal Server  Development        
>
> IBM Deutschland Entwicklung  GmbH         
> Schoenaicher  Str. 220, 71032         Boeblingen
> Phone:        +49 7031  16-3313 (*120 3313)          
> Email:  Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com         <mailto:Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com>
>          ---------------------------------------------------------------------------    
>           
>   
>        
>
> Andre Kramer   <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>             
>         <mailto:andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>   
>
> 20.05.2003          13:40
>                   
>                  To:        Stephan          Laertz/Germany/IBM@IBMDE            
>                  cc:         
>                  Subject:        RE: testing IBM   producer
>  
>          
>           
>
>
>
>
> ok,  I'll display portlet 0.1 and portlet 0.2 or        0.3     together. What's          
>  the  difference between 0.2 and        0.3?
   
>         regards,  
>        Andre
> -----Original        Message-----
> From:        Stephan Laertz  [mailto:Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com]    
>  Sent: 20 May  2003  12:27        
> To: Andre  Kramer      
> Cc: david.ward@oracle.com         <mailto:david.ward@oracle.com>;           Peter  
>   Fischer3; 'Richard Jacob'         
>  Subject: Re: testing IBM          producer
>
>
>
> Hi Andre,            
>  
> comments  below       
>  
> MfG / Best  regards,  
>  
> Stephan  Laertz        
>
>          --------------------------------------------------------------------------    
>           
>        WebSphere   Portal Server  Development        
>
> IBM Deutschland  Entwicklung   GmbH
> Schoenaicher Str. 220,  71032        Boeblingen
> Phone: +49         7031 16-3313   (*120 3313)        
> Email:  Stephan.Laertz@de.ibm.com          
>          ---------------------------------------------------------------------------    
>           
>   
>        
>
> Andre   Kramer  <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>           
>          <mailto:andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>   
>
> 20.05.2003          12:44   
>                   
>                  To:         Stephan          Laertz/Germany/IBM@IBMDE,  Peter     
>         Fischer3/Germany/IBM@IBMDE            
>                  cc:        Andre         Kramer  <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>           
>        <mailto:andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>,    Richard  Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE,           
> "'David        Ward'"   <david.ward@oracle.com>   <mailto:david.ward@oracle.com>     
>                  Subject:                testing IBM   producer 
>   
>                   
>  
>  
>
>
>
> Much better today!  But I notice  that the wsp-mode   rewrite token  is          
> called  wsrp-Mode.             
>         <step>You're right.  Just a typo.   Thanks</step>             
>       
> For portlet 0.1        (see  attached  ibm0.3-action&mode),    clicking a link  
>  now results in a   performBlockingInteraction. This  sets  the           
> navigationalState to  "none"  but        seems  to have no other impact, as           
>  the following getMarkup         returns the  same table of   date/links. What           
> is         the expected  behaviour?            
>  <step>  Portlet 0.1        only   writes something (a  date   string)         in the  
>         GroupSession. This string   is read by portlet  0.2         and 0.3 and  used to    
> fetch the  dilbert comic of  that         specific day (you  clicked on in 0.1)     
> from the dilbert           site.</step>           
>             
> Also, calling  getMarkup with          <mode>wsrp:edit</mode>   causes the         
> "Error occurred        while invoking   portlet service!" markup  to get            
>         returned (only for portlet   0.3).    
>  <step>I          wonder why this doesn't happen with  0.2.  They have the        same  
>         code.</step>              
>              
> For  portlet 0.2,  I  (see        attached ibm0.1) get the "Could  not connect  
> to  Dilbert home page"         markup.  I can now click on the "Edit" link    
>   (with a work        around for wsrp-Mode)  to get to the   edit mode         dialog,    
>  but:           
> <step>I don't know why the  portlet     cannot connect   to the dilbert           
>  site. I will check          that.</step>   
>     
>     - I do not  know what to enter         for  proxy host   and port.    
> <step>These  fields         can be used to  enter the  proxy server and port         
> which are used by        the portlets to   connect to  the dilbert site.             
>                       You should not enter any values here,  unless you want to          
> see        what   happens if the  portlet can not connect (The         markup you've   
> seen   already).    
>                       Once I've fixed some bugs you can use  this form to test          
> form        parameters  and           namespacing.</step>             
>               
>     - Checking        the   "display a  local  Dilbert image"  and then        Submit   
>        simply goes back to  the   "Could not connect ... "          markup.    
> <step>Yes, I  also  recognized  this bug this morning. I'm  still           
> working on it. I'll  let you         know!</step> 
>               
> Anything else I could         be    testing?           
>  <step>I'm afraid no, as long        as  I'm not finished    working on that  
>  issues. I hope this will        be   tomorrow.</step>      
>             
>        regards,    
> Andre    
>    
>
>
> #### ibm0.2.xml   has been        removed from this note on  May  20 2003 by   
> Stephan Laertz           
> ####           ibm1.0-action&mode.xml has been removed from this note on        May 20    
>        2003 by   Stephan  Laertz           
>
>
>
>
> --  
>          ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> David          Ward
>        Principal  Software  Engineer        
>  Oracle  Portal        
> Oracle  European  Development        Centre
> 520 Oracle         Parkway
> Thames        Valley  Park
>        Reading
>  Berkshire        RG6 1RA  
>         UK          
> Email: david.ward@oracle.com <mailto:david.ward@oracle.com>
> Tel: +44 118         924  5079
> Fax:        +44 118  924  5005
>  
>  
>
>
>
>  

--         
------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Ward          
Principal Software        Engineer  
Oracle        Portal  
Oracle European        Development Centre
520 Oracle        Parkway  
Thames         Valley Park  
Reading
Berkshire RG6        1RA  
UK
Email:  david.ward@oracle.com <mailto:david.ward@oracle.com>
Tel: +44 118 924          5079
Fax: +44 118        924   5005



--  






David Ward
Principal Software Engineer
Oracle                Portal
Oracle European Development Centre   
520 Oracle Parkway              
Thames  Valley Park
Reading  
Berkshire RG6 1RA              
UK                        
Email:              david.ward@oracle.com    
Tel:     +44 118 924 5079    
Fax:     +44 118 924                  5005







--






David Ward
Principal Software Engineer
Oracle                Portal
Oracle European Development Centre   
520 Oracle Parkway              
Thames  Valley Park
Reading  
Berkshire RG6 1RA              
UK                        
Email:              david.ward@oracle.com    
Tel:     +44 118 924 5079    
Fax:     +44 118 924                  5005













--



David Ward
Principal Software          Engineer
Oracle Portal
Oracle European Development Centre
520 Oracle Parkway
Thames          Valley Park
Reading
Berkshire RG6 1RA
UK
Email:
david.ward@oracle.com
Tel:
+44 118 924 5079
Fax:
+44 118 924    5005




--



David Ward
Principal Software Engineer
Oracle Portal
Oracle European Development Centre
520 Oracle Parkway
Thames Valley Park
Reading
Berkshire RG6 1RA
UK        
Email:
david.ward@oracle.com
Tel:
+44 118 924 5079
Fax:
+44 118 924 5005







[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]