OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp-interop message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsrp-interop] guest/anonymous user access



In order for a compliant Consumer to send userCategory="wsrp:minimal", the Producer must have specified it in its ServiceDescription.

Rich



Atul Batra <atul.batra@Sun.COM>

03/25/2004 01:54 PM

To
Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc
wsrp-interop@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject
Re: [wsrp-interop] guest/anonymous user access






So if I understand correctly, to allow the Consumer to send wsrp:minimal for the userCategory and enable guest access per the convention, are we are saying that the Producer should (or rather is best advised to) minimally declare support for wsrp:minimal in it's ServiceDescription? Else, there could be interop issues down the line (particularly with other implementations that come along)?

Atul

Rich Thompson wrote:


The spec explicitly says that the Producer declares all the user categories it supports, including those defined by the spec (see 5.1.19). It is an error for a Consumer to send a userCategory the Producer has not declared as supported (see 6.10.1).


The convention adopted by the Interop SC was to have both the userContextKey and userCategory be wsrp:minimal for a guest user. How an implementation supports changing the category to null is up to the implementation.


Rich


Maneesha Jain <maneesha.jain@Sun.COM>

03/25/2004 12:42 PM


To
Richard Jacob <richard.jacob@de.ibm.com>
cc
Atul Batra <atul.batra@Sun.COM>, wsrp-interop@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject
Re: [wsrp-interop] guest/anonymous user access









Richard Jacob wrote:




Atul Batra
<atul.batra@Sun.COM> wrote on 03/17/2004 02:57:03 AM:

 
I know that was discussed a while back, but just to confirm -  are
Producers out there expecting anything other than
userContextKey=
wsrp:minimal (and userAuthentication=wsrp:none as well)
in order to "recognize" a guest user? Specifically, does the agreed to
interop convention mandate that userCategory be equal to
wsrp:minimal as
well?
 
 
yes, userCategory is
wsrp:minimal and if then the userContextKey is
wsrp:minimal, too, it's a guest user with no userProfile.

cheers
Richard

 
Hi Richard,

Two more related questions :

What do producers make out of a user whose
userContextKey=
wsrp:minimal and userCategory=null ? How
is it different from a guest user whose userContextKey=
wsrp:minimal
and userCategory=
wsrp:minimal ?

For a guest user, would you recommend userCategory to be set to

wsrp:minimal, even when a producer doesn't define any user categories
in the ServiceDescription or defines user categories that are not one of
the  three standard user categories defined in the spec. Just want
to make sure, producers won't throw back InvalidUserCategoryFault in
this case.

thanks,
Maneesha




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]