[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-markup] URL Rewrite Senario Question
That was a con when there was only one type of rewriting in the picture. We have since introduced both the namespace and proxy types of rewriting. Chris Braun <cbraun@silverstr To: WSRP-Markup <wsrp-markup@lists.oasis-open.org> eam.com> cc: Subject: [wsrp-markup] URL Rewrite Senario Question 06/19/2002 05:01 PM I'm revamping the main Markup doc and came across a statement. It states that for URL Rewrite scenario 2: Con - "Uniqueness problem for JavaScript functions and variables when two instances of the same portlet coexist in the same page." I'm not sure I understand this. This is a namspacing/prefixing issue not a URL rewrite issue isn't it? The consumer will probably need to supply a namespace to the entity. I see this as another token that will be rewritten by the consumer. This token can be used so that HTML form controls and javascript functions can be namespaced. We can provide a mechanism that allows this for both scenario 2 and 4. I see this as analogous to the URL rewriting except that we are dealing with a simple namespace instead of a URL. Am I missing something? Thanks, Chris
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC