[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-markup] Today's call
Sorry, I didn't get around to this before your meeting today. From your prior message to me this week you seem to think we need a major revision to our CSS classes. I suggest this be evaluated/discussed at the whole TC level with respect to its impact on 1.0. I.e. do you have a version/revision/upgrade plan? Would it be better to delay 1.0 in lieu of the future changes and just improve it now? Anyway can you add this to this/next weeks TC agenda -- I sure don't want to release 1.0 if we think a portion of it is damaged yet don't have an upgrade plan. -Mike- Rex Brooks wrote: > Thanks for the note, Rich. We will take note of this, and discuss it. > > Ciao, > Rex > > At 7:54 AM -0400 6/11/03, Rich Thompson wrote: > >> Rex, >> >> I will not be able to make today's call as I need to take a son to a >> doctor appointment. >> >> I do intend to regularly participate in the markup SC and am >> particularly interested in the CSS class discussion. As a basic >> reminder, the portlet-table-* set of classes were created because >> people found the mapping of the more general portlet-section-* >> classes to be problematic. We should debate whether changing the >> descriptions in the spec are worth it at this time (we would need to >> recommend the exact changes as an errata item) or whether elaborated >> discussion in the primer will suffice for v1. >> >> Rich Thompson > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]