RE: [wsrp-pfb] Outline for pfb specification section

[Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>]

Title: Message

I also could not dial in. I'm most happy with the approach of publishing a wsrp producer's service "wsdl" in UDDI (as our basic pfb support) and would make the outline's portlet sections optional (or even experimental - unless we come up with a good, intuitive means to do this). And I suspect publishing a producer via its wsdl does not need much more than what Alan outlined, so don't mind much where we document this "best practice".

 

regards,

Andre

-----Original Message-----
From: Von Riegen, Claus [mailto:claus.von.riegen@sap.com]
Sent: 30 September 2003 16:14
To: 'Kropp, Alan'; 'wsrp-pfb@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: RE: [wsrp-pfb] Outline for pfb specification section

Alan,

 

I'm sorry but I can't attend today's conference call. I will try to review the proposed outline later this week.

As already said, I'd like to suggest to develop a separate specification for WSRP PFB, similar to the approach the UDDI TC has done with developing a Technical Note for Using WSDL in UDDI.

 

Best regards,

 Claus

-----Original Message-----
From: Kropp, Alan [mailto:Alan.Kropp@vignette.com]
Sent: Montag, 29. September 2003 21:18
To: 'wsrp-pfb@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: [wsrp-pfb] Outline for pfb specification section

Here's an outline of the specification section for 1.1.  I've indicated detail where I think there's enough information from existing proposals/discussion to warrant it.  Obviously this is a work in progress, so feel free to critique and suggest revisions.

 

I'd like to walk through this in detail during tomorrow morning's call.