[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fw:[wsrp-pfb] Groups - wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-01.doc uploaded
unintentionally replied to PM only...
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,
Richard Jacob
______________________________________________________
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM on 12/18/2003 10:13 AM -----
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Richard Jacob |
| | |
| | 12/17/2003 06:19 |
| | PM |
|---------+---------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Andre Kramer <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com> |
| cc: |
| From: Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE |
| Subject: RE: [wsrp-pfb] Groups - wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-01.doc uploaded(Document link: Richard Jacob) |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Thanks for reviewing.
see my comments in <rj>
Btw. on our UDDI technote discussion yesterday I forgot to ask one
additional question:
Are there volunteers to co-author the note?
How about you Andre?
The note would be more "acceptable" when more than one author is designated
(doesn't look like a one-man-show then).
Also this would likely improve the quality.
What do people think? Are there UDDI experts who want to join?
As said in the call I plan to have a first (better: second) draft including
portlet pubishing, and some issues revisited by end of this week.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,
Richard Jacob
______________________________________________________
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Andre Kramer |
| | <andre.kramer@eu.|
| | citrix.com> |
| | |
| | 12/17/2003 05:28 |
| | PM |
|---------+---------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE |
| cc: |
| Subject: RE: [wsrp-pfb] Groups - wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-01.doc uploaded |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I scanned the doc and it looks fine but here are some things I noticed:
- need to mention that other bindings can be added. Our "v1" binding tModel
sounds like it is the only game allowed in town ...
<tj> totally agree, this is the minimal one we need to achieve a common
publishing model, but other are still allowed of course </rj>
- some places use "WSRP Producer" tModel, some "WSRP Producer Service"
<rj> maybe lost that while cut&pasting some things, need to fix that </rj>
- WSRP Producer overviewURL must point to this doc? Maybe a separate "this
is a WSRP Producer" placeholder doc? As this tModel will be for all
versions.
<rj>good point, but since the tModel gets introduced with this version
wouldn't it be sufficient to point to this doc? But I think we could go
also the other route</rj>
- 5.3 Entities SHOULD NOT be published ...
Why do we stop people doing things outside our spec? It would just not be
covered by our best practice so a weaker "should not" would be ok.
<rj>agreeable</rj>
- steps to publish 1. to .. Are these steps (i.e. protocol exchanges) or
just info the publisher should provide?
<rj> for now just info to figure our in my mind what we need to do :-) my
comment here would be: we need some rewrite. But in essence this would be a
"what needs to be provided" overview </rj>
printing figure 2 lost some XML. Maybe my printer but means I need to
review the doc more carefully next time!
<rj> I must confess I was lazy and copied the images from the strawman, I
think we might want to redraw and fine tune them a little bit </rj>
regards,
Andre
-----Original Message-----
From: richard.jacob@de.ibm.com [mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com]
Sent: 16 December 2003 17:12
To: wsrp-pfb@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-pfb] Groups - wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-01.doc uploaded
The document wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-01.doc has been submitted by Richard
Jacob (richard.jacob@de.ibm.com) to the WSRP Publish/Find/Bind SC document
repository.
Document Description:
First draft of UDDI PFB technote. Portlet publishing not added yet.
Download Document:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/wsrp-pfb/download.php/4536/wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-draft-01.doc
View Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/wsrp-pfb/document.php?document_id=4536
PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email
application
may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and
paste
the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-pfb/members/leave_workgroup.php
.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]