[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-pfb] PFB technical notes ready for public review
Luc,
thanks for working this out. I copied the wsrp-pfb SC on this.
I agree on this appoach, sounds good to me.
There is one thing to notice:
We talked about the oasis partition in the UBR a while ago with John and
Claus (afair) and by that time we came out with uddi:oasis-open.org:<tc
name> as the partititons.
We're now adding the "committees" subpartition.
In general I agree on following the oasis convention (this is used on the
OASIS-Site only, right?).
However, do we need the "committees" subpartition at all?
The only advantage I see it brings us is the fact that keys having the same
name as a tc might be registered in the oasis-open.org partition.
I see that having the subcommittees partition is a little bit cleaner.
In our current UDDI TN we have chosen the first convention for our keys:
"uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp".
If you intend to introduce the "committees" subpartition, please let us
now, since we then need to change the V3 keys in our tech note (and thus
regenerate the derived V2 keys).
We intended to accept and finalize the tech note on our F2F next week.
The change, or at least the change request for this must be done prior to
this.
To be clear: I (and hopefully speaking on behalf of our SC) am happy with
either convention, but it is important for us timing wise to know which
direction you intend to go as soon as possible.
On the timing: when do you think we will be ready to go and have the tModel
keys in place?
You can find all the keys we intend to register in our tech note:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/wsrp-pfb/download.php/9532/wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-1.0-draft-11.pdf
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,
Richard Jacob
______________________________________________________
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
WSRP Standardization Technical Lead
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com
"Luc Clement"
<Luc.Clement@syst
inet.com> To
Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
10/30/2004 05:25 cc
PM "'Rogers, Tony'"
<Tony.Rogers@ca.com>, John
Colgrave/UK/IBM@IBMGB, "'Von
Riegen, Claus'"
<claus.von.riegen@sap.com>, "'Rob
Kochman'" <robko@microsoft.com>,
"'Andrew Hately'"
<hately@us.ibm.com>
Subject
RE: [wsrp-pfb] PFB technical notes
ready for public review
Richard,
See attached email. Sorry for the delay - I hope to solidify this plan
shortly. Once we agree on the plan (per attachement) you and I should
approach OASIS to get this "blessed". Are you ok with this approach?
Once this is one, we can ask the elected UBR operator to register the
specific set of keys you need. Could you please provide me with that list
of
keys?
Luc
Luc Clément
Co-Chair OASIS UDDI Spec TC
Systinet
Tel: +1.617.768.4268
www.systinet.com
----- Message from "Luc Clement" <Luc.Clement@systinet.com> on Sat, 30 Oct
2004 11:21:47 -0400 -----
To: "'John Colgrave'" <colgrave@uk.ibm.com>, "'Andrew Hately'"
<hately@us.ibm.com>, "'Von Riegen, Claus'"
<claus.von.riegen@sap.com>, "'Rob Kochman'" <robko@microsoft.com>
cc: "'Rogers, Tony'" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
Sub RE: OASIS keyGenerator
jec
t:
John:
This is how I'd like to deal with this - basically, we follow your
suggestion:
1. we register a key generator for oasis-open.org; register a key
generators for "committees"; and register key generators for each TC
as they need it. To start with we would create keys for the following
TC:
UDDI Spec TC
WSRP
I propose the following name/address convention based on
current the current OASIS convention:
uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:<tc identifier>
2. To start with, we would register:
1. uddi:oasis-open.org:keygenerator (derived key:
uuid:966812b7-f798-3cd0-bc23-a946d36270d6)
2. uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:keygenerator (derived key:
uuid:61c808e5-8159-348a-9ab1-b0df93de48d3)
3. uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:uddi-spec:keygenerator
(derived key: uuid:6852eca3-bcb2-3f32-b168-ca6c83d848c8)
4. uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:wsrp:keygenerator (derived
key: uuid:c906ae88-26d0-33ec-9a41-861a4f35d108)
Based on this I've prepared the list of keygenerator tModels
that we should register - see attached.
3. We get one of the operators to register the following tModels - I
propose IBM but will let Claus/Andrew/Rob to figure out who should
publish (and maintain the source file).
4. We post these keygenerators at http://uddi.org/tmodels.html
Once we settle on this, we'll get approval from the TC and inform OASIS of
the plan.
Luc
From: John Colgrave [mailto:colgrave@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 09:21
To: luc.clement@systinet.com
Subject: OASIS keyGenerator
Luc,
There was an e-mail discussion about six months ago regarding registering a
keyGenerator for OASIS, with a key of uddi:oasis-open.org:keyGenerator.
Has any progress been made with this? The WSRP folks are getting close to
defining their keys and I imagine we will have to have this OASIS
keyGenerator tModel in place first.
Regards,
John
--------------------------------------------------
John Colgrave
Architect, IBM WebSphere UDDI Registry[attachment
"OASIS-keyGenerator-tModels.xml" deleted by Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]