[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-pfb] PFB technical notes ready for public review
[1] http://uddi.org/tmodels.html The tModels for the WSRP-PFB TN have not been published yet at [1]. Nor do the keyGenerator tModels discussed below appear on [1]. And they are not registered in the UBR (using v2 keys). I have taken an interest lately in WSRP, and would like to discover various WSRP producers. The WSRP proxy portlet in Liferay Pro 3.2.0 comes configured with [3], which seems to be down at the moment. [2] lists some others, some of which do not work. BEA has one [4]. Vignette has one [5]. Sun's appears to work [6]. Maybe there are others. But it would be nice if WSRP proxy portlets could do a UDDI lookup to find the available WSRP producers. This would require the tModels discussed in the draft WSRP-PFB-UDDI TN. What is the status of this? [2] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/group_public/download.php/7507/wsrp-interop-producers.htm [3] http://portalstandards.oracle.com/wsrp/jaxrpc [4] http://wsrp.bea.com/portal/producer?wsdl [5] http://wsrpdemo.vignette.com:8080/producer/wsdl [6] http://sunwsrp.dyndns.org/portal/wsrp/wsdl/default Paul At 08:08 AM 2004-11-02, Richard Jacob wrote: >Luc, > >thanks for working this out. I copied the wsrp-pfb SC on this. >I agree on this appoach, sounds good to me. >There is one thing to notice: >We talked about the oasis partition in the UBR a while ago with John and >Claus (afair) and by that time we came out with uddi:oasis-open.org:<tc >name> as the partititons. >We're now adding the "committees" subpartition. >In general I agree on following the oasis convention (this is used on the >OASIS-Site only, right?). > >However, do we need the "committees" subpartition at all? >The only advantage I see it brings us is the fact that keys having the same >name as a tc might be registered in the oasis-open.org partition. >I see that having the subcommittees partition is a little bit cleaner. > >In our current UDDI TN we have chosen the first convention for our keys: >"uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp". >If you intend to introduce the "committees" subpartition, please let us >now, since we then need to change the V3 keys in our tech note (and thus >regenerate the derived V2 keys). >We intended to accept and finalize the tech note on our F2F next week. >The change, or at least the change request for this must be done prior to >this. >To be clear: I (and hopefully speaking on behalf of our SC) am happy with >either convention, but it is important for us timing wise to know which >direction you intend to go as soon as possible. > >On the timing: when do you think we will be ready to go and have the tModel >keys in place? > >You can find all the keys we intend to register in our tech note: >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/wsrp-pfb/download.php/9532/wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-1.0-draft-11.pdf > >Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards, > > Richard Jacob >______________________________________________________ >IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany >Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development >WSRP Standardization Technical Lead >Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888 >Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com > > > > "Luc Clement" > <Luc.Clement@syst > inet.com> To > Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE > 10/30/2004 05:25 cc > PM "'Rogers, Tony'" > <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>, John > Colgrave/UK/IBM@IBMGB, "'Von > Riegen, Claus'" > <claus.von.riegen@sap.com>, "'Rob > Kochman'" <robko@microsoft.com>, > "'Andrew Hately'" > <hately@us.ibm.com> > Subject > RE: [wsrp-pfb] PFB technical notes > ready for public review > > > > > > > > > > >Richard, > >See attached email. Sorry for the delay - I hope to solidify this plan >shortly. Once we agree on the plan (per attachement) you and I should >approach OASIS to get this "blessed". Are you ok with this approach? > >Once this is one, we can ask the elected UBR operator to register the >specific set of keys you need. Could you please provide me with that list >of >keys? > >Luc > >Luc Clément >Co-Chair OASIS UDDI Spec TC >Systinet >Tel: +1.617.768.4268 >www.systinet.com > > >----- Message from "Luc Clement" <Luc.Clement@systinet.com> on Sat, 30 Oct >2004 11:21:47 -0400 ----- > > To: "'John Colgrave'" <colgrave@uk.ibm.com>, "'Andrew Hately'" > <hately@us.ibm.com>, "'Von Riegen, Claus'" > <claus.von.riegen@sap.com>, "'Rob Kochman'" <robko@microsoft.com> > > cc: "'Rogers, Tony'" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com> > > Sub RE: OASIS keyGenerator > jec > t: > > >John: > >This is how I'd like to deal with this - basically, we follow your >suggestion: > 1. we register a key generator for oasis-open.org; register a key > generators for "committees"; and register key generators for each TC > as they need it. To start with we would create keys for the following > TC: > UDDI Spec TC > WSRP > I propose the following name/address convention based on > current the current OASIS convention: > uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:<tc identifier> > 2. To start with, we would register: > 1. uddi:oasis-open.org:keygenerator (derived key: > uuid:966812b7-f798-3cd0-bc23-a946d36270d6) > 2. uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:keygenerator (derived key: > uuid:61c808e5-8159-348a-9ab1-b0df93de48d3) > 3. uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:uddi-spec:keygenerator > (derived key: uuid:6852eca3-bcb2-3f32-b168-ca6c83d848c8) > 4. uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:wsrp:keygenerator (derived > key: uuid:c906ae88-26d0-33ec-9a41-861a4f35d108) > > Based on this I've prepared the list of keygenerator tModels > that we should register - see attached. > 3. We get one of the operators to register the following tModels - I > propose IBM but will let Claus/Andrew/Rob to figure out who should > publish (and maintain the source file). > > 4. We post these keygenerators at http://uddi.org/tmodels.html >Once we settle on this, we'll get approval from the TC and inform OASIS of >the plan. > >Luc > > >From: John Colgrave [mailto:colgrave@uk.ibm.com] >Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 09:21 >To: luc.clement@systinet.com >Subject: OASIS keyGenerator > > >Luc, > >There was an e-mail discussion about six months ago regarding registering a >keyGenerator for OASIS, with a key of uddi:oasis-open.org:keyGenerator. >Has any progress been made with this? The WSRP folks are getting close to >defining their keys and I imagine we will have to have this OASIS >keyGenerator tModel in place first. > >Regards, > >John >-------------------------------------------------- >John Colgrave >Architect, IBM WebSphere UDDI Registry[attachment >"OASIS-keyGenerator-tModels.xml" deleted by Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM] > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of >the OASIS TC), go to >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-pfb/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]