Re: [wsrp-pfb] Reference to UDDI, ebXML, Abstract PFB Model tech notes in2.0 spec draft?

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

These have been held up pending an update
to the OASIS artifact naming guidelines as these impact URNs. Hopefully
we will be able to move forward in the next month or so, but it does raise
an interesting question about when the work to update these to v2 should
start. Hopefully we can publicize the v1 versions while v2 is going through
the standardization process. It would be nice to release the v2 versions
quite close to the approval of v2 as a standard.

Rich

"Andre Kramer" <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>

07/07/05 12:18 PM

To	Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc	<wsrp-pfb@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	[wsrp-pfb] Reference to UDDI, ebXML, Abstract PFB Model tech notes in 2.0 spec draft?

Since we did not
exactly over achieve publicising the registry tech notes via the OASIS
Web pages, should we add references to the tech notes and state that it’s
backwards compatible (or the tech notes are forward compatible if one prefers)?
What do you think?
 
Regards,
Andre