Re: [wsrp-primer] wsrp-primer-1.0-draft0.41-rex

[Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>]

In  my draft, registration comes after service description for the 
reasons you enlist. I found it more logical to explain with the use 
cases I'm using.

Subbu

Rich Thompson said the following on 10/27/2003 12:56 PM:

>
> Glad some of the feedback is useful. The reason I question placing the 
> Registration interface first is that is even when a Producer uses the 
> inband form of registration, the Consumer will need to call 
> getServiceDescription() first to see what data is required for the 
> call to register(). At best that places it as the second interface.
>
> Rich
>
>
> *Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>*
>
> 10/27/2003 03:38 PM
>
> 	
> To
> 	Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, wsrp-primer@lists.oasis-open.org
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	Re: [wsrp-primer] wsrp-primer-1.0-draft0.41-rex
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> In the basic scenario, when I mentioned registries I don't know how it 
> ended up coming out that way. I meant only to say that the information 
> on producers could be found that way. Sorry. I should have waited and 
> then proofed it when I was fresh.
>
> I asked for the registration interface to be first because if we 
> expect or want registration to be used, I thought it should be treated 
> as starting the process. That may be my own literal-mindedness. I 
> expect tutorials to show the order in which a process is conducted. 
> That may also reflect my own bias toward consumer concerns more than 
> producer concerns.
>
> Thanks for catching the numbering. I got caught up in the details.
>
> I put the Init Cookie diagram in where Init Cookie fell. I admit I 
> didn't spend much time thinking about it.
>
> Thanks for the proofreading. I didn't see any comments in 1, so I 
> assume you included it for reference?
>
> Ciao,
> Rex
>
>  
> At 1:20 PM -0500 10/27/03, Rich Thompson wrote:
> As I glanced at this version I was impressed with the progress you 
> guys are making. I also noticed a few conceptual areas where I thought 
> it might be useful to comment before things went too far down a track 
> that I thought didn't quite square with the spec. These are captured 
> using Word comments in this version:
>
>
>
> Rich
> *Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>*
> 10/26/2003 01:09 PM
> To
> wsrp-primer@lists.oasis-open.org
> cc
> Subject
> [wsrp-primer] wsrp-primer-1.0-draft0.41-rex
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Here is my first whack at Alan's last draft. I have left a whopping
> lot of Markup unwritten due to not having all the samples ready, but
> I have outlined the entire Interface section and included 3 of
> Subbu's 4 diagrams. I have put my notes inline in Times Bold to
> distinguish it from the rest of the text and other comments. It was
> quite a workout even with the missing stuff. Basically I tried not to
> do anything that might need to be redone significantly, and did as
> much as I could given my other obligations at themoment, plus, as
> Alan knows, the weather is too hot, or too nice, depending on your
> viewpoint, to stay inside.
>
> Anyway, we certainly have plenty to chat about.
>
> Ciao,
> Rex
> --
> Rex Brooks
> GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
> W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
> Email: rexb@starbourne.com
> Tel: 510-849-2309
> Fax: By Request
>
> Attachment converted: Enterprise:wsrp-primer-1.0-draf#29EF 1.doc 
> (WDBN/MSWD) (0029F38E)
> Attachment converted: Enterprise:wsrp-primer-1.0-draf#29EF 2.doc 
> (WDBN/MSWD) (0029F38F)
>
>
> -- 
>
> Rex Brooks
> GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
> W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
> Email: rexb@starbourne.com
> Tel: 510-849-2309
> Fax: By Request