[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [wsrp-wsia] WSRP TC Call Minutes Thursday, September 19th 2002
Please find the WSRP TC call minutes attached - Richard, thanks for taking notes during the issues section of the call. Lothar, could you please put these Minutes on the web site ? Best regards, Thomas ----------------------------- WSRP TC Call Minutes Thursday, September 19th 2002 WSRP Members William Cox, Bea here Adrian Fletcher, Bea here Gino Filicetti, Bowstreet not here Davanum Srinivas, CA not here Peter J Quintas, Divine not here Alan Kropp, Epicentric here Nigel Ratcliffe, Factiva here Aditi Karandika, France Telecom not here Madoka Mitsuoka, Fujitsu here Takao Mohri, Fujitsu not here Angel Luis Diaz, IBM not here Carsten Leue, IBM here Rich Thompson, IBM here Charles Wiecha, IBM here Ron Daniel Jr., Interwoven not here Jon Klein, Reed-Elsivier not here Adam Nolen, Reed-Elsivier not here David Taieb, IBM not here Petr Palas, Moravia IT not here Mark Cassidy, Netegrity here Michael Freedman, Oracle here Mike Hillerman, Peoplesoft not here Khurram Mahmood, Peoplesoft not here Susan Levine, Peoplesoft not here Sasha Aickin, Plumtree here Brian Dirking, Stellent here Alejandro Abdelnur, Sun here Dave Clegg, Sybase here Mark Rosenberg, Tibco not here Eilon Reshef, WebCollage not here Tim Granshaw, SAP Portals not here Yossi Tamari, SAP Portals here Stephen A. White, SeeBeyond not here Andreas Kuehne, - not here Eric van Lyndegraf, Kinzan here Joe Rudnicki here Andre Kramer here Prospective Members Shumakher Gennady, SAP here Richard Cieply here WSIA Ravi Konuro here Monica Martin here Rex Brooks here Accept WSRP Minutes from 3rd Face to Face Meeting ------------------------------------------------- Minutes have been accepted. Motion to allow the chair to place resolutions up for e-mail votes ------------------------------------------------------------------ Topics to vote on will be put up on the mailing list after Tuesdays prioritization meetings for voting until the Thursday of the following week. The e-mail votes will be counted before the meeting and votes made in the call will be added. How do we handle voting on the TC Specification ? ------------------------------------------------- Charlie and Thomas will get Karl Best's advice, an easy option in any case is for the few WSIA members who are not also WSRP members to join WSRP. Review schedule proposal and agree on further schedule ------------------------------------------------------ Schedule updated as follows: Sept 27th Spec Editors provide draft 0.7 for review Oct 7th TC has provided all comments on 0.7 draft Oct 20th Spec Editors provide draft 0.8 for review Nov 4th-8th 4th F2F: Resolve remaining tech. issues TC by best effort raised all tech. issues for 1.0 Spec Nov 22nd Editors finish draft 0.9 Put under change control Dec 16th TC provided all editorial comments on draft 0.9 Last additional tech issues raised by exception Jan 7th Finish draft 0.91 reflecting edit. comments from TC Put draft 0.91 on WSRP Web Site to get feedback Jan 13th-17th 5th F2F: Finalize 1.0 TC Specification If time permits discuss 2.0 direction/concepts and compliance test kit Location: West Coast Host: tbd Jan 31st Release of WSRP 1.0 Technical Commitee Specification We'll put the 0.7 and all following drafts on the WSRP web site. We put the issues list on the WSRP web site as HTML. WSRP Implementations -------------------- "Release of WSRP 1.0 Open Source Impl. at Apache" taken out of WSRP schedule since it is separate from the spec and no to do for the TC. List companies doing implementations on the web site, the Apache Open Source implementation will be one of hopefully many. Issues to be discussed / resolved as of Rich's note: ---------------------------------------------------- (#1) Yossi: chapter 1 to verbose, we teach people to much, spec audience knows what portals are Thomas: we could just refer to white paper in the spec introduction instead of having it entirely in there Mike: insert appropriate spec oriented introduction instead, add explanation of what entities, sessions and stuff we are talking about Bill: Introduction should remain for clearance. 2 Parts of spec considered not to good. Howevere the tutorial stuff may be moved out. Stuff like models, concepts, introduction should remain in spec. Thomas: Consensus seems to be that we should rewrite the intro of the spec to be more technical than the whitepaper Decision: Rewrite intro of the specification so that it is not identical with the whitepaper but more technical as needed to understand the spec. (#7) General: need more clarification on session scopes we define. Rich: we should defer it until spec updated and clarified, so people can fully understand this issue (#10) Rich: handles invariant, while states change. Currently people need to take a deeper look into it. Defer decision to next meeting. (#16) Rich, Andre, Mike: might be useful but we should defer it for 1.0. Put this on the issue list. Vote next thursday whether to defer it or not. (#42) Editors need to add clarity to the next draft. Defer decision until then. (#44) Mike: prefer sessionExpires, this is more cleaner. Rich, Thomas, Carsten: refHandleExpires reflects change to refHandle better General: not a really big topic. Vote on next thursday. (#45) General: need more discussion. Defer decision after things become clearer. (#48) Rich: not piece of metadata in V1.0 (unassigned) Relation of Portlets, Portlet Instances and POEs/CCEs ran out of time. Discuss this next week
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC