RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#6]Update: Is groupId required?

[Gil Tayar <Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com>]

Yup. Sorry. I'll update the list (remove the "we are postponing..." part). Note however that a "tentative proposal" email was also sent.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tamari, Yossi [mailto:yossi.tamari@sap.com]
Sent: Thu, September 26, 2002 20:32
To: 'Gil Tayar'
Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#6]Update: Is groupId required?

Hi Gil,

 

I think you got a little confused. Regarding this we said we will vote next week to remove groupId from the spec.

It was regarding the isRefresh that we said we will defer until after the JSR meeting.

 

    Yossi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:29 PM
To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [I#6]Update: Is groupId required?

Owner: Michael Freedman

Title: Is groupId required?

Description:

Since we now have initEnvironment, which is the solution for shared sessions, do we now need groupId, which was also defined as a mechanism for group sessions.
We are postponing this until we hear some more information from the JSR-168 liason people.