OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp-wsia message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#106] Uniqueness of entityHandles







While this conversation has separately gone down the track of how this use
case could be made to work, why should cloneEntity() return anything in the
case of an entity that isn't clonable? Since we decided not to carry this
as entity level metadata, I think the right protocol choice is for the
Producer to throw a fault message indicating the entity is not clonable.
The Consumer then knows it is always referencing the same entity rather
than thinking there are two when there really is only one.



                                                                                                                 
                      "Tamari, Yossi"                                                                            
                      <yossi.tamari@sap        To:       wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org                          
                      .com>                    cc:                                                               
                                               Subject:  RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#106] Uniqueness of entityHandles     
                      10/09/2002 05:14                                                                           
                      AM                                                                                         
                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                 



While Gil is obviously correct in theory, it might useful in practice to
allow a producer to return the same handle as a result of CloneEntity. If
this entity has no persistence, there doesn't seem to be a need for a
different handle, and it removes the need for this simple producer of
dealing with multiple entityHandles.

             Yossi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 6:41 AM
To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] [I#106] Uniqueness of entityHandles


How can it be other than a MUST? If two entities have the same handle, then
they are, by definition, the same entity. This is not even a MUST - it is
evident by the very nature of the definition of a handle as a unique
identifier of something.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Tayar [mailto:Gil.Tayar@webcollage.com]
Sent: Wed, October 09, 2002 06:38
To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [I#106] Uniqueness of entityHandles


Topic: Interface
Class: Technical
Raised by: Rich Thompson
Title: Uniqueness of entityHandles
Date Added: 9-Oct-2002
Document Section: Interfaces/6
Description:
Do we want a statement about uniqueness of entity handles within the scope
of a registration? Would it be a SHOULD or a MUST?


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>






[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC