[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] [I#114] Should custom roles,modes & window states use namespacin g?
Draft v0.8 added this for the name of a role (namely "The name for this
role. Preferred form for this names is a URI such that it is definitively
namespaced."). I do not think this would be quite so useful for modes and
window states as I would expect there to be a much smaller set proposed by
vendors and we are likely to want to capture them in a future version so
that the names/semantics are standardized.
Other thoughts?
Gil Tayar
<Gil.Tayar@webcol To: "'wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org'"
lage.com> <wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc:
10/15/2002 02:27 Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [I#114] Should custom roles, modes & window
AM states use namespacin g?
Status: Active
Topic: meta
Class: Minor Technical
Raised by: Andre Kramer
Date Added: 15-Oct-2002
Section: Interfaces/11.26
Title: Should custom roles, modes & window states use namespacing?
Description:
Roles have string names which are not required to be URIs. MUST be
(namespaced) URIs would be much better in a distributed (mulit-vendor)
environment.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC