RE: [wsrp-wsia] Draft v0.8

[Rudnicki Joseph G CONT NSSC <RudnickiJG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>]

Hello,

Have we received any additional info from WebCollage?

Thank you.

Joe Rudnicki


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Schaeck [mailto:SCHAECK@de.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:26 AM
To: Michael Freedman
Cc: 'wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org '
Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] Draft v0.8




Hi Mike,

the IPR statement on the WSRP site is from WebCollage.

The second part of my note below refers to Joe's example of the OASIS ebXML
Collaboration Protocol Profiles (CPP's).
There, an IPR statement was submitted by IBM. In that case, IBM provided a
nonexclusive, royalty free patent license, see excerpt below.

You shoud be able to find the patent application here:
http://ep.espacenet.com/
Do a search with WebCollage in the "Company name search" box and the patent
app will pop up.

Best regards,

Thomas




To:    "'wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org '" <wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc:
Subject:    Re: [wsrp-wsia] Draft v0.8



Thomas,
    I am confused.  I thought the IPR claim was made by WebCollage?  Their
statement says they have patents (and pending patents) that apply to our
work.
Unfortunately they don't say what these patents are or how they apply --
hence
we can't evaluate its impact on the spec.  How can we get the details about
these impacts?
     -Mike-

Thomas Schaeck wrote:

> I've got Karl Bests response - the IPR Statement is FYI for the TC, with
no
> action required.
>
> More explanation from Karl:
>
> "TC members should take this statement into account as they prepare and
> approve any technical work, and OASIS members should take this into
account
> at whatever time they are asked to approve the TC's work as an OASIS
> Standard. Then of course implementors of the spec should do the same. (If
> someone doesn't like the claim they can then choose not to participate,
> approve, or implement.)
> OASIS' policy in regards to IPR is full disclosure; we want everyone to
> know what IP claims there are so that they can make decisions regarding
> participation, approval, and implementation."
>
> Joe, the IPR statement referenced in the Navy's vote says
>
> "... As provided in IBM's May 16, 2002 disclosure to OASIS, IBM will,
upon
> written request, continue to provide a nonexclusive, royalty free patent
> license, with other reasonable terms and conditions for ALL patents
issued
> to IBM which contain essential claims and for which IBM is able to
provide
> patent licenses (including the issued patent and unpublished patent
> application disclosed above), for the OASIS ebXML Collaboration Protocol
> Profiles (CPP's) and Collaboration Protocol Agreements (CPA's) Versions 1
> and 2 specifications. This patent license is available to all entities.
> Should those requesting a patent license also have essential claims to
the
> referenced OASIS CPPA specifications, IBM will grant this patent license
> provided that the recipient, in return, will grant IBM a reciprocal
license
> to their essential claim(s). ..."
>
> Did that resolve the Navy's concerns ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
>
> Rudnicki Joseph G CONT NSSC <RudnickiJG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL> on 10/28/2002
> 03:13:06 PM
>
> To:    Thomas Schaeck/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, Rudnicki Joseph G CONT NSSC
>        <RudnickiJG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
> cc:    Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "'wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
'"
>        <wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Subject:    RE: [wsrp-wsia] Draft v0.8
>
> Hello,
>
> If you want more information on the organizations IPR concerns, please
see
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-voting/200210/msg00047.html and
> read
> the comments on the Department of Navy's ebXML CPPA v2 vote.
>
> Take care.
>
> Joe Rudnicki
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Schaeck
> To: Rudnicki Joseph G CONT NSSC
> Cc: Rich Thompson; wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
> Sent: 10/28/02 4:28 AM
> Subject: RE: [wsrp-wsia] Draft v0.8
>
> Joe,
>
> I've contacted Karl Best to find out whether there is something to do
> for
> us as the TC.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
>
> Rudnicki Joseph G CONT NSSC <RudnickiJG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL> on 10/25/2002
> 07:06:26 PM
>
> To:    Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
> cc:
> Subject:    RE: [wsrp-wsia] Draft v0.8
>
> Hello,
>
> Has anything happening relative to IPR claims? This subject is of
> considerable concern to a number of people in the organization that I
> represent.
>
> Take care.
>
> Joe Rudnicki
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:50 PM
> To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] Draft v0.8
>
> I just noticed that Word had done something weird to the operation
> signatures for getMarkup and performInteraction. They should be:
>
> markupResponse = getMarkup(refHandle, registrationContext,
> entityContext,
> userContext, markupParams, templates);
>
> interactionResponse = performInteraction(refHandle, registrationContext,
> entityContext, userContext, markupParams, interactionParams);
>
> Based on today's discussion, I deleted requestMetadata and changed the
> wording for requestParameters in section 5.1.4 to:
> "requestParameters: Name/value pairs reflected from the query string of
> the
> activated URL. These are the query string parameters the Consumer did
> not
> consume by processing them itself. Other name value pairs (e.g. HTTP
> headers from the client or additional Consumer-supplied data) should be
> placed in the extensions array."
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>




----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>