[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [wsrp-wsia] Minutes for 7 January 2003 Meeting
<Many thanks to Rich and Gil for their issues posts after the meeting> <note to website maintainer: the company name "Reed-Elsivier" should be "Reed-Elsevier"> WSRP Members Attendance: Aickin, Sasha Plumtree Yes Allamaraju, Subbu BEA Yes Atkinson, Olin Novell Yes Blich, Amir SAP No Braun, Chris Novell Yes Brooks, Rex Starbourne Yes Cox, T. J. Novell No Cox, William BEA Yes Dirking, Brian Stellent No Drye, Stephen Art Technology Yes Dyinin, Jane Plumtree No Fillicetti, Gino Bowstreet No Freedman, Michael Oracle Yes Jacob, Richard IBM Yes Klein, Jon Reed-Elsevier No Kramer, Andre Citrix Yes Kropp, Alan Vignette Corporation Yes Leue, Carsten IBM Yes Machak, Dan Tibco Yes Martin, Monica Drake Certivo Yes Mitsuoka, Madoka Fujitsu Yes Nolen, Adam Reed-Elsevier No Palas, Petr Moravia IT Yes Pugsley, Ken Peoplesoft No Randhawa, Sunit Fujitsu No Ratcliffe, Nigel Factiva No Reshef, Eilon WebCollage No Rudnicki, Joe U.S. Navy Yes Schaeck, Thomas IBM Yes Shumaker, Gennady SAP Yes Smith, Steven Capitol College Yes Stanko, Joseph Plumtree Yes Tayar, Gil WebCollage Yes Thompson, Rich IBM Yes Tamari, Yossi SAP Portals Yes van Lydegraf, Eric Kinzan Yes Wiecha, Charles IBM Yes Young, Michael Plumtree Yes Members on Leave of Absence: Abdelnur, Alejandro Sun until 26 January Ramesh, Raj CommerceOne until 15 January Prospective Members: Rubini, Ross Plumtree Yes 27 of 38 voting members attending Meeting started at 12:05pm EST Minutes from 19 December 2003 approved with 3 corrections made by Rich. These items should read as follows: #154 Discussion - We are not currently synchronized with JSR168 - We have not decided to synchronize with JSR168 - Gil will produce 3 versions for the Primer (such as configuredPortlet) Will not change API names #173 Summary not yet added - Will will try the overview section in the next version #174 Roles: Change "must" to "must not" - no objections, but this is tentative relative to resolution of #185 Minutes from 2 January 2003 approved Gil will post an updated issue list. Rich will post an updated version of the spec by the end of the week (maybe called version .87 or .88). #169 Does refresh page (F5/Ctrl+R) re-invoke performBlockingInteraction? - Up to the Consumer implementation. - Many will do a redirect so a refresh is just a getMarkup() - Producer must be prepared for End User pusihg the button a second time - Resolved to add text to spec and primer #183 markup charset differen to the same as the XML response charset? - resolved: set a note to the editors that they are to be kept the same (attachments are excluded) #170 Scope of Producer-Consumer HTTP session - resolved: maximum scope is the scope of the Consumer client's logical session (vague about what a session is) #154 Rename "entity" to "portlet" (re-opened due to JSR168 change) - resolved:Use "portlet" where no distinction is necessary. Use Producer configured-portlet and Consumer configured-portlet where the distinction is necessary #185 Remove concept of Roles from the spec - resolved: Rename "role" to "usercategory" - resolved: Leave "usercategory" in userContext #174 The Consumer SHOULD NOT assert a role for a role which ... - tentative resolve: change to 'MUST NOT" - tentative resolve: add text that all supported userCategories MUST be declared (including predefined terms) #175 Roles should be per-Entity and not per-Producer - resolved: leave as is #184 Can performInteraction return new navigationalState? - resolved: No, cannot return new navigationalState. Operation is just getMarkup() plus interactionParams #181 Registration Changes - resolved: leave in for version 1. May still need to work out the details - Revisit for version 2. #179 requestParameter semantics unclear -resolved: + Remove requestParameters + Add interactionState to interactionParams + Add text about navigationalState reflects how to regenerate the page, interactionState reflects input to perform*interaction + Add text around what navigationalState to use when returning markup from BlockingInteraction + Add text about Consumer's processing URL activation Next meeting will be Thursday, 9 January at 5pm German time/11am EST/8am Pacific Details about the next face-to-face meeting will be posted on the website tomorrow. meeting ended 1:39pm EST -Steven
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC