wsrp-wsia message

Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #46] interactionState required?

From: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
To: wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:50:50 -0500

Document: Spec & wsdl
Section: 6.1.16
Page/Line: 39/22
Requestedby: Michael Freedman
Old text: [R] string interactionState 
Proposed text: [O] string interactionState
Reasoning: Why is this a required field. I.e. why pass "" when there is no 
state?

References:
- [wsrp-wsia] [change request] Suggested Format
  - From: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>