[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #62] Producer caution on returningmarkup
Should this go into the spec or into the primer? It seems evident to me.
Best regards
Carsten Leue
-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401
Rich
Thompson/Watson/I
BM@IBMUS To
wsrp-wsia@lists.oasis-open.org
01/24/2003 06:01 cc
PM
Subject
[wsrp-wsia] [change request #62]
Producer caution on returning
markup
Document: Spec
Section: 6.3.2
Page/Line: 41/41
Requestedby: Michael Freedman
Old text: Since this operation ....
Proposed text: Note, if the Producer chooses to use the optimized form of
this operation and return markup directly, care must be taken to ensure
the markup is generated with the navigationalState that is the result of
executing the operation and not the navigational state that was passed to
it. This ensures consistency when the optimization is not used and the
Consumer invokes getMarkup() after performBlockingInteraction() returns.
Reasoning: I like it better ;-)
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC