[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] Minutes for 04 March 2003 Meeting (Corrected)
I would like to be listed as still on leave of absence as I am still recovering from surgery. I will be able to start attending again March 27. Thank you, Steven Smith Capitol College --On Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:22 PM -0800 Danny Machak <dmachak@tibco.com> wrote: > Corrected version > - fixed the roll call summary > - change comments on CR 166 > =================================================================== > WSRP Teleconference Minutes > March 4, 2003 > > Call Started at 9:07 AM PST > > ==================================================================== > Roll Call > Voting Members: > --------------------------------- > Alejandro Abdelnur Sun yes > Sasha Aickin Plumtree no > Subbu Allamaraju BEA yes > Olin Atkinson Novell yes > Atul Batra Sun yes > Amir Blich SAP yes > Chris Braun Novell no > Rex Brooks Starbourne yes > T.J. Cox Novell no > William Cox BEA no > Brian Dirking Stellent no > Michael Freedman Oracle yes > Ross Fubini Plumtree yes > Richard Jacob IBM yes > Jon Klein Reed-Elsevier yes > Andre Kramer Citrix yes > Alan Kropp Vignette Corporation yes > Carsten Leue IBM yes > Dan Machak Tibco yes > Madoka Mitsuoka Fujitsu yes > Adam Nolan Reed-Elsevier yes > Petr Palas Moravia IT no > Sunit Randhawa Fujitsu yes > Nigel Ratcliffe Factiva yes > Gennady Shumaker SAP yes > Steven Smith Capitol College no > Yossi Tamari SAP Portals yes > Gil Tayar WebCollage no > Rich Thompson IBM yes > Eric van Lydegraf Kinzan no > Charles Wiecha IBM yes > > Total voting members: 31 > Voting members in attendance: 22 (71%) > A quorum was present. > > > Members on Leave Of Absence > ---------------------------- > Raj Ramesh CommerceOne LOA > Joe Rudnicki U.S. Navy LOA > Thomas Schaeck IBM LOA > > ==================================================================== > The corrected minutes from 2/27/03 were accepted > > ==================================================================== > Summary of Change Requests: > > 175 - Clarify available modes ACCEPTED > 176 - ID, Key and Handle not used in WSDL ACCEPTED > 180 - Correct section reference ACCEPTED > 181 - Reword "block all" ACCEPTED > 182 - Clearer definition of extensions field ACCEPTED > 168 - Nil desiredLocales => sendAllLocales? ACCEPTED > 141 - Add previous windowState and mode? DEFERRED (Pending JSR) > 178 - markupCharacterSet in MarkupContext ACCEPTED* > 139 - Add optional UpdateResponse.isSecure? DEFERRED (version 1.1) > 166 - Add UserProfile.profileItems? ACCEPTED* > 194 - P3P alignment ACCEPTED > 165 - no userProfile vs no userProfile data DEFERRED (version 1.1) > > * modified - see details below > ==================================================================== > Small editorial/grammar changes: > 175 - Clarify available modes > Section 5.1.10 / Page 19 / Line 39 > Adds language for what modes are available and which should be > described > > 176 - ID, Key and Handle not used in WSDL > wsrp_v1_types.xsd > Add comments about why the types Handle, ID and Key are not > used in the WSDL > > 180 - Correct section reference > Section 3.8 / Page 13 / Line 14 > > 181 - Reword "block all" > Section 3.10 / Page 13 / Line 33 > Proposes rewording in the negative so that the word "block" is > not used. > > 182 - Clearer definition of extensions field > Section 5.1.6 + many others / Page 17 / Line 41 > Proposal rewords this oft repeated statement. > > Resolution: Accepted > > ==================================================================== > 168 - Nil desiredLocales => sendAllLocales? > Sections 5.2 & 8.2 / Page/Line: 25/23 & 52/17 > Proposal is to drop sendAllLocales in favor of a nil value for > desiredLocales > > Resolution: Accepted > > ==================================================================== > 141 - Add previous windowState and mode? > Section 6.1.2 / Page 26 / Line 46 > This would place the burden of remembering the previous > windowsState and mode on the Consumer and thereby permit the Portlet > to know about interesting transitions that do not involve user > interactions with the Portlet's markup. > > Resolution: Deferred (JSR-168 is still defining this behavior) > > ==================================================================== > 178 - markupCharacterSet in MarkupContext > Section 6.1.10 / Page 31 / Line 26 > Proposal adds this field. Email discussion has suggested > adding text referencing the RFC for mime types and providing > an example for declaring the charset. > > encoded in content type. Only really needed for binary data, where > the binary data is text. > > Resolution: Accepted: Will not be a separate field, but will be > provided in content type. Will reference mime-type RFC > and provide an example. Will be a MUST for binary data. > Add language as similar to UploadContext > > ==================================================================== > 139 - Add optional UpdateResponse.isSecure? > Section 6.1.13 / Page 34 / Line 32 > This would enable the return from performBlockingInteraction() to > change whether or not the Portlet needs the client page to be secure. > > - We not allow a change as a result of an action. Is this an > oversight or intentional? > > Resolution: Defer consideration until 1.1 spec. > > ==================================================================== > 166 - Add UserProfile.profileItems? > Section 6.1.18 / Page 64 / Line 18 > Proposal is for an explicit mechanism to carry string extensions > to the UserProfile > > Resolution: Accepted. Add comment: A common extension would be to > send profile values as NamedString type. > > ==================================================================== > 194 - P3P alignment > Section 6.1.18 and 11 / Page/Line: 35/49 + pages 68-69 > Notes that the change of the name field to personname was not > carried throughout > > Resolution: Accepted > > ==================================================================== > 165 - Semantics of no userProfile vs no userProfile data > Section 6.1.19 / Page 39 / Line 22 > Proposal is to inform Portlets when the UserContext is shared > using a nil userProfile. > > Resolution: Defer consideration until 1.1 spec. > > ==================================================================== > Next Meeting: > > Thursday March 6 > 8:00 am PST / 11:00 am EST / 5:00 pm CET > duration: 2 hours > ==================================================================== > > Meeting adjournded at 10:00 AM PST > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]