[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp][markup] Allowed HTML Tags
Eilon - I fully agree with your comment. Maybe we should introduce other
classifiers than "yes" or "no". May be "allowed but discouraged". You would
hesitate to allow these tags if the official HTML definition disallows
their usage in blocks other than the <head> environment. If this woks,
maybe only by chance.
I still have to figure out what the official spec says.
Best regards
Carsten Leue
-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401
|---------+----------------------------->
| | "Eilon Reshef" |
| | <eilon.reshef@webc|
| | ollage.com> |
| | |
| | 04/15/2002 04:53 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to |
| | "Eilon Reshef" |
| | |
|---------+----------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Carsten Leue/Germany/IBM@IBMDE |
| cc: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org |
| Subject: RE: [wsrp][markup] Allowed HTML Tags |
| |
| |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Carsten,
I am unaware of the formal definition, especially in XHTML, but these are
widely used in practice in HTML code. I haven't been involved in the markup
subgroup, but I believe we should be non-restrictive enough to allow (or,
rather, non to completely disallow) those existing methods, even if we
don't formally "endorse" them. I think that as long as the semantics of the
composed page is well defined, we should be in a good shape and should
apply syntactic restrictions when it is clear that these two match. Does
that make sense?
Regards,
Eilon
-----Original Message-----
From: "Carsten Leue" <cleue@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 16:09:48
To: "Eilon Reshef" <eilon.reshef@webcollage.com>
Subject: RE: [wsrp][markup] Allowed HTML Tags
Eilon -
I suggested to disallow the elements "style" and "link" because my HTML
documentation states that they are only valid with the "head" block. I will
try to check another source of documentation to be sure.
Best regards
Carsten Leue
-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401
|---------+----------------------------->
| | "Eilon Reshef" |
| | <eilon.reshef@webc|
| | ollage.com> |
| | |
| | 04/15/2002 03:56 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to |
| | "Eilon Reshef" |
| | |
|---------+----------------------------->
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: Carsten Leue/Germany/IBM@IBMDE,
<wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: RE: [wsrp][markup] Allowed HTML Tags
|
|
|
|
|
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
We might need to refine some of the rules beyond "yes" and "no".
For example, there is no reason to disallow <style> and <link> tags, as
long as they don't change the semantics of the container document. For
example, if the portlet uses scoping within CSS, the styles don't affect
the container document, and yet this provides lots of flexibility to the
portlet designer (that's mandatory for really sophisticated applications).
Eilon
-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Leue [mailto:cleue@de.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:58 AM
To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp][markup] Allowed HTML Tags
Hi - here is the proposed list of valid HTML tags in WSPR.
(See attached file: HtmlTags.zip)
Best regards
Carsten Leue
-------
Dr. Carsten Leue
Dept.8288, IBM Laboratory Böblingen , Germany
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4603, Fax: +49-7031-16-4401
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC