wsrp message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [wsrp] [change request #250] Only 1 performBlockingInteraction()?
- From: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
- To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:59:12 -0500
Document: Spec
Section: 6.3.2
Page/Line: 44/28
Requested by: Michael Freedman
Old text: The Consumer MUST initiate at most one performBlockingInteraction()
for any one client request.
New text: remove this newly added line
Reasoning: Do we really want to restrict ourselves by this for the
future? As we haven't addressed events yet, should we be cautious
to not handtie us if we find a use case/rationale that through handling
of events would cause another blocking action to be called? What
is the harm of NOT limiting ourselves. As long as each adheres to
blocking rule it would seem safe.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]