Re: [wsrp] WSRP WSDL not currently conformant with WSDL 1.1 schema

["Thomas Schaeck" <SCHAECK@de.ibm.com>]

Thanks for figuring this out, Yossi.

If during the voting process or during the 30 day public review people find
some remaining bugs in the spec, we should queue those up in an errata
section that we can fold into the spec after the review period, when we
consider the comments from the 30 day period of official public review
before submitting the spec to OASIS.

Best regards,

Thomas



|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           "Tamari, Yossi"  |
|         |           <yossi.tamari@sap|
|         |           .com>            |
|         |                            |
|         |           04/22/2003 07:53 |
|         |           PM               |
|         |                            |
|---------+---------------------------->
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                                              |
  |       To:       "'wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org'" <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>                                                    |
  |       cc:       "'andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com'" <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>                                                  |
  |       Subject:  [wsrp] WSRP WSDL not currently conformant with WSDL 1.1 schema                                               |
  |                                                                                                                              |
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Hi,
Claus Von Riegen, who is a new observer of the WSRP from SAP and a WSDL and
UDDI expert, had been running our WSDL through WS-I testing tools, which
check for WSDL schema conformance. He found one minor problem regarding our
definition of SOAP faults.
Our WSDL uses qualified names to reference portType fault operations from
soap:fault elements. Taking the following WSDL fragment (that is part of a
wsdl:operation, which in turn is part of a wsdl:binding) as an example,
  <wsdl:fault name="AccessDenied">
    <soap:fault name="intf:AccessDenied" use="literal"/>
  </wsdl:fault>
The "intf:" prefix makes the WSDL document invalid against the WSDL 1.1
schema, since the soap:fault name attribute is of type NCName.

Removing all occurrences of the "intf:" prefix should resolve the issue.

I am sorry to raise this issue at such a late point, but I think that since
fixing it is very simple and should not create controversy, and since it
doesn't affect the spec itself, we can fix it without reopening the
ballot...

     Yossi.