Re: [wsrp] [errata #19] Mode change conformance statement

[Alejandro Abdelnur <Alejandro.Abdelnur@Sun.COM>]

Why do we need the ", but the Portlet must not depend on such a request being respected." ? 

Can we remove it?

Thanks.

Alejandro

On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 10:54 AM, Rich Thompson wrote:

> 5/13/03 (F2F)
> Conformance statement for mode would be better in section 6.8. It should also be reworded for clarity to the portlet developer.
>
> Document: Spec
> Section:  6.1.12
> Old Text: The Consumer MAY choose to respect this request to change the mode, but since the Portlet cannot depend on that choice it MUST NOT encode this new mode into any of its stateful settings. Rather, the Portlet MUST compute any such impact on stateful settings after the Consumer has actually changed the mode.
>
> New Text: See section 6.8 relative to the processing of such requests.
>
>
> Document: Spec
> Section:  6.8
> Old Text: Whether or not such a request is honored is up to the Consumer and often will depend on access control settings for the End-User.
>
> New Text: The Consumer MUST respect requests to change the mode outside of exceptional circumstances (e.g. access control restrictions), but the Portlet must not depend on such a request being respected.