[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp] Issue #37: Recommend portlet handles be UIDs?
right, and how does that fit with our statement that portlet handles are scoped by the registration only? Didn't we say for the import/export feature that producers/vendors supporting migration accross Producers need to make sure they do the right stuff to handle this? We have even a means for that in the protocol. I agree that it is a good idea to have some form of uniqueness for portlet handles but we shouldn't require it. Also versioning comes into play here, right? Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards, Richard Jacob ______________________________________________________ IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development WSRP Standardization Technical Lead Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888 Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com> To 01/14/2005 10:05 wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org PM cc Subject Re: [wsrp] Issue #37: Recommend portlet handles be UIDs? Currently, Consumers are not supposed to care about the structure/format of portletHandles. Could you elaborate on the motivation for this recommendation? Subbu Rich Thompson wrote: > > Issue # 37 > Spec section: > SubCommittee: Interfaces > Owner: Mike > Description: Add recommendation that at least POP handles, and > preferably all portlet handles, be some form of UID as newer portlet > factories potentially cross registration and Producer boundaries. To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/members/leave_workgroup.php .
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]