OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [wsrp] Issue #31: handleEvent or handleEvents?

comment on 3+4.
why could a event processing failure not be in turn an event of its own. In
that case portlets could simply sign for such events.

Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,

        Richard Jacob
IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany
Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development
WSRP Standardization Technical Lead
Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469  -  Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888
Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com

             Rich Thompson                                                 
             m>                                                         To 
             03/04/2005 08:16                                           cc 
                                       RE: [wsrp] Issue #31: handleEvent   
                                       or handleEvents?                    

This issue has been discussed under an email subject line of " [wsrp]
handleEvent or handleEvents?". Before tailing off, this thread came to
several guidelines for any solution moving this operation back to a bulk

1. Portlets are loosely coupled components integrated onto the page by the
2. Events are independent notifications that something has occurred, which
receiving portlets may use to impact their state.
3. There are times when a Consumer will care what failures have occurred
(e.g. for retry purposes).
4. Portlets should be able to indicate they also care about event
processing failures.

Any additional comments before we move to drafting a solution?


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]