RE: [wsrp] Issue #43: Collapse HandleEventResponseandBlockingInteractionResponse?

["Andre Kramer" <andre.kramer@eu.citrix.com>]

We do need two XML elements in order to stick to a SOAP response naming convention where the response = operationName + “Response” but XML Schema type communality or extensibility could be looked at. We have an action to do this for all 2.0 types at some point now that XML Schema extension is better supported .. you did all verify this against your tool chain I hope :-)

 

Regards,

Andre

 

---

From: Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
Sent: 07 March 2005 17:08
To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrp] Issue #43: Collapse HandleEventResponseandBlockingInteractionResponse?

 

Issue # 43
Spec section:
SubCommittee: Interfaces
Owner: Rich (raised by Artem Spector)
Description: HandleEventResponse and BlockingInteractionResponse are identical, but defined as two distinct types, why is this?