Re: [wsrp] [CR311] - Reference Event Driven Application methodology?

[Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>]

 > 1.         Event Distribution: This mechanism _enables development of
 > event driven portal applications. It _provides for portlets generating
 > and consuming events that carry both semantic meaning through their name
 > and data in their payload…

Just a suggestion. How about "enables development of event driven 
portlets"?

Subbu

Rich Thompson wrote:
> 
> I have been forgetting to bring this change request up for an approval 
> vote. The consensus on the February 24, 2005 TC call was to approve, but 
> we did not have a quorum. This is a reminder that it will be on the 
> agenda for the next call.
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> *Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS*
> 
> 02/02/05 11:19 AM
> 
> 	
> To
> 	<wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	[wsrp] [CR311] - Reference Event Driven Application methodology?
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *
> Document:* Spec 2.0 *
> Section:* 3.9 Consumer Mediated Coordination *
> Page/Line:* 15/30-33 *
> Requested by:* Yossi Tamari *
> Old text:*
> Consumers may implement mechanisms through which portlets react in a 
> coordinated manner. This specification defines two such mechanisms:
> 1.         Event Distribution: This mechanism provides for portlets 
> generating and consuming events that carry both semantic meaning through 
> their name and data in their payload…
>  *
> New text:*
> Consumers may implement mechanisms through which portlets react in a 
> coordinated manner. This specification defines two such mechanisms:
> 1.         Event Distribution: This mechanism _enables development of 
> event driven portal applications. It _provides for portlets generating 
> and consuming events that carry both semantic meaning through their name 
> and data in their payload…
>  *
> Reasoning: *The change uses the “event driven application” (EDA) tag, 
> which is becoming a well known methodology, to make the intent of the 
> mechanism immediately clear to the reader. The rest of the sentence 
> discusses the technical details of how it is enabled, but not the goal.