OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsrp] Issue#44: Add feedback mechanism to public parametermodel?


But isn't it a burden for the producer to provide this kind of feedback? 
There are other areas (such as registration properties, user profiles 
etc.) where the producer does not provide any feedback.

Regards,

Subbu

Andre Kramer wrote:
> Public parameters allow a consumer to direct a Portlet in how it should 
> render itself. However, we have no means for the rendering to provide 
> feedback on whether or not the markup was able to effectively use such 
> information. This issue already came up in support for device 
> capabilities and extending MIME support but I believe it to be a valid 
> use case for any rendering input. For example, a consumer could provide 
> a “timezone” public parameter and the Porlet could reply with: ignored 
> (consumer could add a “crossing timezone” border); equalsnative; 
> converted; or even synchronized (allowing a sophisticated consumer to 
> not bother to send that parameter again).
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Andre
> 
>  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* Rich Thompson [mailto:richt2@us.ibm.com]
> *Sent:* 05 May 2005 13:16
> *To:* wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
> *Subject:* Re: [wsrp] Issue#44: Add feedback mechanism to public 
> parametermodel?
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Andre,
> 
> Could you start this discussion with a use case or two and show how this 
> proposal would solve them?
> 
> Rich
> 
> *Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS*
> 
> 05/05/05 08:05 AM
> 
> 	
> 
> To
> 
> 	
> 
> wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
> cc
> 
> 	
> 
>  
> 
> Subject
> 
> 	
> 
> [wsrp] Issue#44: Add feedback mechanism to public parameter model?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 	
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Issue # 44
> Spec section:
> SubCommittee: Interfaces
> Owner: Andre Kramer
> Description: Would not a NamedStringArray (use the name to refer to a 
> supplied public parameter) returned to the Consumer provide a useful 
> feedback mechanism to public parameters?
> 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]