[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp] User Profile Items - Draft Proposal
It's a bit miss leading to claim UserProfile elements can't be extended in 1.0. While I'm not opposed to using properties as a extension mechanism, I think the intent was to allow each of the UserProfile sub-elements to be extensible? E.g. EmployerInfo could carry standard codes for type-of-business in an extension element using some existing XML schema. Therefore, would it not be better to leave custom values to XML as an extension, at the appropriate level, relying on namespacing, rather than forcing a property model to be in use at the profile level? Regards, Andre -----Original Message----- From: Subbu Allamaraju [mailto:subbu@bea.com] Sent: 31 May 2005 20:46 To: wsrp Subject: [wsrp] User Profile Items - Draft Proposal One of the action items at the last F2F was for Richard and me to propose a fix to the user profile related inconsistencies in the V1 spec. I'm attaching a note on this for your review. Since Richard is out sick, I would appreciate if someone from IBM checks to see if it meets his concerns and use cases. Regards, Subbu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]