[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Session scoped transient properties.
Currently we don't allow getMarkup and getResource to return transientPropertyUpdates; only performBlockingInteraction and handleEvents can. Should we remove this restriction? Currently, we don't allow navigational state, mode, window state changes from getMarkup/getResource because we can't ensure the consumer can implement reasonable semantics. To a lesser extent we disallow this because our model discourages state changes during render. However, because we can't control internal producer session state this is a convention not something that can be fully enforced. I believe setting transient session properties at GM/GR time can be semantically defined -- its no different then doing such a thing locally in a concurrent world. I.e. the consumer honors such sets immediately [as with handleEvents]. So, though we would continue to want to discourage transient property state changes should we prevent it merely on the grounds that its not our preferred model? What we lose by having this restriction are degrees of freedom in how environments built on top of wsrp that ease portlet development will expose this concept. One reasonable model [that JSR 286 is currently advocating] is to not distinguish within portlet code between transient session properties and producer session properties. From a code perspective there are just session properties. The code reads/writes these values without explicit knowledge as to whether the value is shared with the consumer. That detail is described in configuration/metadata. The JSR 286 container is responsible for moving the appropriate values to/from the session from/to the consumer. Like wsrp, the jsr discourages session state changes during render/getresource. Also like wsrp it doesn't prevent such changes. With the current restriction the JSR is faced with either tightening its requirements to throw an exception if any session writes are attempted, allowing the local writes but throw an exception for those session properties that are shared [transient], or merely updating the values locally but not returning such state to the consumer [meaning these updates will be lost on the next request as the transient properties are pushed again with the old values]. All three of these are behaviors will be foreign to java [web app] developers. -Mike-
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]