Re: [wsrp] clearification: event types and payload

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

Anyone object to my including such a
conformance statement into draft 15? (I'll look for other equivalent situations
as well)

Rich

Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>

03/29/06 11:35 AM

To	WSRP TC <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	Re: [wsrp] clearification: event types and payload

Good catch. I guess the same argument can be made
for other places where 
the type is returned in one message, but the actual data is carried in
another message.

I have a follow up question. When the runtime type does not match the 
one specified in the metadata, should the message-recipient ignore the
data, or try to process as best as it could, or return a meaningful 
fault (other than OperationFailed).

Subbu

Stefan Hepper wrote:
> Hi,
> currently the 2.0 spec stated in
> 6.1.15 Event Type
> 
> type:  A reference to a schema-defined type for the event's payload.
> payload:  This optional field contains the data for the event.
> 
> However, the spec does not state that if type is present that there
must 
> be a payload. I think we should add this conformance statement as
it 
> does not make sense to me to have a type specified but not a payload.
> 
> Stefan
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your
TCs in 
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php