Re: [wsrp] schemaLocation in 5.1.11 & 5.1.12

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

Yes, ServiceDescription.schemaTypes
and ModelDescription.modelTypes are both of type ModelType.

The reason that we had originally not
placed the modelTypes field directly within PropertyDescription was a hope
that types would be reused while seeking to just transmit the type information
once. I don't think that matters for the URI of a schemaLocation field
and there certainly is value to placing it next to the type declaration.
The question is how far to push this model now that ExtensionDescription
and EventDescription have the same issues. I don't think they can cleanly
reuse the ModelDescription type, but perhaps a wrapper type like it would
be appropriate.

Rich

Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>

05/23/06 04:46 PM

To	Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc	wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject	Re: [wsrp] schemaLocation in 5.1.11 & 5.1.12

I agree. It seems somewhat inconsistent to specify
schemaTypes outside 
respective Description types. For instance, event's type can be 
referenced via EventDescription.schemaLocation, or the 
ServiceDescription.schemaTypes. This makes consumers look into two 
different places to decipher types.

We could consolidate these two into ModelDescription, and make 
ModelDescription contain schemaLocation and schemaTypes.

BTW, isn't schemaTypes the same as ModelDescription.modelTypes? With the
consoliation, schemaTypes would go away completely.

Subbu

Rich Thompson wrote:
> 
> In starting to add the language requested on the last TC call, it
struck 
> me that it would be cleaner to use the ModelDescription type for 
> describing session properties rather than having a separate schemaTypes
> field in 5.1.16 (PortletDescription). Any objections/comments?
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> *Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS*
> 
> 05/22/06 01:53 PM
> 
>                  
> To
>                  wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
> cc
>                  
> Subject
>                  [wsrp]
locale definition
> 
> 
>                  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The F2F asked me to locate and add a reference to the actual definition
> of locales. I think this is RFC3066 (_http://tools.ietf.org/html/3066_)
> and am adding that reference to section 5.1.10 for wd17. If someone
has 
> a better reference, please post it soon.
> 
> Rich 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
> unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in 
> OASIS at: 
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
> unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in 
> OASIS at: 
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php