[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp] Defined events
Another way to explain this is that event names are QNames, "wsrp:eventHandlingFailed" is not a valid local name. Subbu Michael Freedman wrote: > Hopefully implementers aren't confused by this ... well it confused at > least the first implementator in our org -- because the reality is no > one, let alone an implementor that has been asked to update an > implementation based on a section in the spec, reads the whole/beginning > of the spec. Anyway, thanks for the clarification. > -Mike- > > Rich Thompson wrote: >> >> Now I see what you are asking. We added the statement you guessed at >> to v2's Section 2, namely; >> >> "Whenever this specification uses the prefix "wsrp:" in what >> appears to be a QName, it is referring to the URI >> urn:oasis:names:tc:wsrp:v2:types." >> >> While the use with modes, etc is literal, since the underlying type is >> string rather than QName, the intent is to point people in the QName >> direction. Hopefully implementers aren't confused by this ... >> >> Rich >> >> >> *Michael Freedman <michael.freedman@oracle.com>* >> >> 03/13/2007 06:42 PM >> >> >> To >> Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS >> cc >> wsrp <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org> >> Subject >> Re: [wsrp] Defined events >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> What I am asking is whether the name (excluding namespace) of the >> event is "eventHandlingFailed" or "wsrp:eventHandlingFailed"? The >> spec seems to suggest the later but I assume we want the former. Are >> you saying that elsewhere in the spec we define that references to >> wsrp: when used for a value that is a QName implies the wsrp (types) >> namespace? I don't recall this and even if we do worry about >> confusion with uses that aren't QNames such as modes. >> -Mike- >> >> Rich Thompson wrote: >> >> These are defined as elements within our types namespace (i.e. >> identical to the fault messages). The Axis tooling I have been testing >> with places them in the right package/namespace. I'm not sure if you >> are raising a tooling issue or if I am just missing the essence of >> your question. >> >> Rich >> >> *Michael Freedman **_<michael.freedman@oracle.com>_* >> <mailto:michael.freedman@oracle.com> >> >> 03/13/2007 12:03 PM >> >> >> To >> wsrp _<wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>_ <mailto:wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org> >> cc >> >> Subject >> [wsrp] Defined events >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Section 6.11 defines two wsrp events: >> wsrp:eventHandlingFailed and wsrp:newNavigationalContextScope. >> The wsdl defines these as eventHandlingFailed and >> newNavigationalContextScope. >> >> I assume the wsdl is the correct way as events are namespace. So is >> this just a simple editorial change? >> -Mike- >> _______________________________________________________________________ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]