Re: [wsrp] [Resource caching] wsrp-resourceCacheability = portlet

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

Good point. The intent may be better
captured by:

"Resource URIs
specifying a value of "portlet" are telling the Consumer that
the resource needs access to the portlet state (e.g. NavigationalContext),
but will not require Consumer processing which needs the state of any other
portlet."

Rich

Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>

03/16/2007 10:42 AM

To	wsrp <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	[wsrp] [Resource caching] wsrp-resourceCacheability = portlet

The first sentence for the value "portlet"
reads as

"Resource URIs specifying a value of "portlet" are telling
the Consumer 
that the resource needs access to the portlet state (e.g. 
NavigationalContext), but not the state of any other portlet. "

The part about "but not the state of any other portlet" seems
confusing. 
   No WSRP-compliant portlets can depend on the state of other portlets
while responding to gm/pbia/gr/he. Even if they want to get other 
portlets' state, they can get it :)

Subbu
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries
 and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
 and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.