[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: RFC on "Related Work" for v1.1.1
Oh, I forgot the tautological question: For “Related Work”, what should I put in for the SOAP Message Security 1.1.1 doc? Following this ‘between-the-lines’, I think its section should read: Related work: This specification replaces or supercedes: From: Carlo Milono I currently took Monica’s suggestion and added a reference to our charter adding information about the numbering scheme…and as I was applying modifications to the documents, I had two questions for clarification/debate: I have something like this for “Related Work”: Related work: This specification replaces or supercedes: This specification is related to: Q1: Should we modify the second bullet point to reference the 1.1.1 specification of SOAP Message Security? Related work: This specification replaces or supercedes: This specification is related to: Q2: I don’t see an Approved Errata for Username Token Profile – should I reference it as the base 1.1 document? I have it thusly: Related work: This specification replaces or supercedes: This specification is related to: Perhaps I should place it under the second bullet, so it reads: Related work: This specification is related to: _______________________ Carlo Milono Director of Engineering - Program Management TIBCO Software Inc. Direct: +1(650) 846-5152 mailto: cmilono@tibco.com |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]