[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [wss] WSS Focus
We are bound by the charter, and the charter limits the scope. I agree that these are all very important and that's why we took the time to take a create a initial roadmap to help guide. I would like to see a "roadmap" become a live non-normative document. Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.689.7866 |---------+----------------------------> | | Krishna Sankar | | | <ksankar@cisco. | | | com> | | | | | | 09/05/2002 09:11 | | | PM | |---------+----------------------------> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: wss@lists.oasis-open.org | | cc: | | Subject: RE: [wss] WSS Focus | | | | | >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Hi all, I don't want to stir-up any controversies - but isn't the roadmap/architecture document supposed to guide us thru these kinds of discussions ? We could add a couple more boxes in the arch diagram and leave that to another group to solve ! Another thought - if we want to rename out TC, we can - at least I think we can (to paraphrase Bob TB) Or really take a little time to see what it means to be a Web Services Security TC and then do the right thing. The WS-Security is just an initial submission, we are not bound by it to do only SOAP-Security. cheers (and have a night flight home for those who traveled from far away lands/states for the f2f) alex Jan Alexander Chief Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox) http://www.systinet.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC