Re: [wss] WSS-SOAPMessageSecurity-11-0303

[Jerry Schwarz <jerry.schwarz@oracle.com>]

At 10:53 PM 3/3/2003, Anthony Nadalin wrote:




>Here is draft 11 of WSS-SOAPMessageSecurity, which addresses:
>
>(1) Issues 60 and 61
>(2) Transform Motion made during last call
>(3) Rob Philpott's issues in note dated 02/25
>(4) Eric Gravengaard's note dated 02/25
>(5) Thomas DeMartini  note dated 02/24
>
>(See attached file: WSS-SOAPMessageSecurity-11-0303.pdf)(See attached file:
>WSS-SOAPMessageSecurity-11-0303-merged.pdf)
>
>Anthony Nadalin | work 512.436.9568 | cell 512.289.4122
>
>

I was a little surprised to see the <Embedded> element. My intention in the 
motion was that the "security token" would appear directly as a subelement 
of the STR.  I don't object to it. It is precisely the "wrapper" that I 
(and I think Ron) have wanted from the beginning. But all my proposals for 
it were rejected.

Introducing it raises the question of where it can appear. In particular 
can it appear directly as a subelement of <Security>? 


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>