[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wss] Interop2 Draft 5
Thanks for all the hard work Hal -- here are a couple of comments/questions: 1. Shouldn't <KeyName> be in the ds namespace not the xenc namespace? 2. The schema definition for ticketType does not look right to me: <complexType name="ticketType"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="text" type="xsd:string" nillable="true"/> <xsd:element name="ticket" type="tns:ticketType" minOccurs="0"/> </xsd:sequence> <xsd:attribute ref="wsu:Id" use="optional"/> </complexType> It looks like the type is being referenced inside of its definition -- is that intentional or is this a cut/paste error? Were you trying to just add an ID to a string value? If so, you might try the following: <complexType name="ticketType"> <xsd:simpleContent> <xsd:extension base="xsd:string"> <xsd:attribute ref="wsu:Id" /> </xsd:extension> </xsd:simpleContent> </complexType> 3. It looks like we have the same [missing] elementFormDefault="qualified" issue we had with the first interop WSDL. That is, making sure every element is a qualified name (not the empty namespace). 4. We need to agree on a session key for scenario #4 -- attached is a proposal, what do people think? 5. We also need to agree on the second certificate used for scenario #4 -- how about if we just use the WSSTest2 certificate from the first interop test? Chris -----Original Message----- From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hlockhar@bea.com] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:22 PM To: wss@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wss] Interop2 Draft 5 To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup .php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]