[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wss] Issue 13, Lines 856-858 in Core, discussed at the call today
Chris, I have researched this a little further and the conclusion I come to is that there already exists a body of implementations that utilize proposal 2: i.e. security tokens at the front and signatures and encryption blocks at the back with new signature or encryption blocks prepending existing signature or encryption blocks, but not prepending security tokens or the timestamp. Therefore, I am recommending the following proposal which first explains the current problem and then gives an explicit recommendation to resolve the issues.