RE: [wss] Groups - WSS-SAML-09.pdf uploaded

["Levinson, Richard" <rlevinson@netegrity.com>]

Ron,

I have reviewed the rest of your comments and I believe
we are in basic agreement on the principles involved,
and what it really boils down to is how to implement
sender-vouches in a recognizable and efficient manner.

In particular, I agree with your comment: 

> I view a SAML holder of key confirmed assertion as an XML 
> certificate. The attesting entity could either use ists XML 
> certificate or its X509 XSN.1 certficate, they are logically 
> equivalent.