RE: Comments on Saml Interop Document

["Levinson, Richard" <rlevinson@netegrity.com>]

Thanks Maneesh,

 

I have included those fixes. After the WSS committee decides the date of the SAML

Interop, I will release the fixes in an update shortly thereafter. So far the changes are

minor and I am reluctant to issue a new version for each small change.

 

Also, I think your comment that said "Line 674, 707" should have been "Line 674, 681, 682" where

the ValueType on 681 should be:

 

    http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0#X509v3

 

and the EncodingType on 682 shoulde be:

 

    http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0#Base64Binary

 

    Thanks,

 

    Rich

---

From: Maneesh Sahu [mailto:maneesh@westbridgetech.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 7:14 PM
To: Levinson, Richard
Cc: wss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Comments on Saml Interop Document

Hi,

 

I found typos in the Sender-Vouches:Signed and Holder-of-Key examples listed in the Saml Interop document. The schema lists the ValueType and URI attributes for KeyIdentifier and SecurityTokenReference as unqualified but the examples lists them with the wsse namespace.

 

Page 25:

            Line 674, 707: The ValueType attribute should be unqualified.           

Line 708: The URI attribute should be unqualified.

 

Page 34:

            Line 976: The ValueType attribute should be unqualified.

            Line 978: The URI attribute should be unqualified.

 

--ms