[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: support for X509 V1 certificates
Does the x509 token profile standardize an interoperable encapsulation of an X.509 V1 certificate in a BinarySecurityToken? It appears that support for the Certificate Path and PKCS7 token types is not required, so it would appear that there is no required support for V1 certificates; either by themselves, or in one of the multiple certificate forms. Is this true? Standard identifiers for V1 certificates can be included in STRs but the profile does not appear to standardize a token type to identify a V1 certificate encapsulated in a Binary Security token. Thus, it doesn't seem like the profile defines an interopable way to send a V1 cert in a wsse:security header, only how to reference one. Can someone provide the rational for leaving out V1 certificates from the token types (that can be encapuslated in a binary security token)? Thanks
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]