[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wss] RSA license and the upcoming SAML Interop
I had reviewed the link you posted before I posted my append, and I have no context for the "we believe", is this Andrew, or is this RSA or some other entity ? Thus the difference in the link and what is posted from Andrew.
In reviewing the IPR declarations for WS-Security (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wss/ipr.php), it seems that all of the individual IPR notices contain the word "believes". I assume these declarations (from ContentGuard, Microsoft, and RSA) were acceptable under OASIS IPR Policy. If so, I don't see the problem with the text quoted below. Anthony Nadalin wrote:
I would like to either reopen AI #280 or create a new AI to cover these concerns. Anthony Nadalin | work 512.838.0085 | cell 512.289.4122 "Nash, Andrew" <ANash@rsasecurity.com>
After some careful review today, we believe that it will not be necessary for implementers engaged in supporting the upcoming interop scenarios to sign the RF license agreement with RSA, provided that Scenario #3 does not make use of an encrypted channel between the Requestor and Responder. --Andrew |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]