[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wss] SwA Interop 1 Scenarios
Blake, I promised to send you a couple of line numbers regarding some potential issues in the SwA interop doc. I took a closer look, and I noticed that the wsse:reference(s) (i.e. #myEncCert) that I had had trouble matching up with a corresponding security token, do indeed match up. In looking back over the doc, I recalled pausing over the following two sentences (and variants of same which occur throughout the doc). I am not sure what effect these sentences are expected to have. Maybe they are important, but they seem not to say anything sufficiently definitive, or in other words that could serve to reduce the potential variability in the certificates used. "The certificate SHOULD NOT have a KeyUsage extension. If it does contain a KeyUsage extension, it SHOULD include the values of 378 keyEncipherment and dataEncipherment. 379" Ron Blake Dournaee wrote: >All, > >Here is the first cut at the interop scenarios document for SwA. > >Blake Dournaee >Senior Security Architect >Sarvega, Inc. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >This body part will be downloaded on demand. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]