[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Formal submission from WSS TC for OASIS final standardizationprocess
Kelvin, Chris: I acknowledge receipt of this submission in time to meet the October deadline. I'll start checking the submission, and get back to you with any concerns. I won't know the numbers (e.g. OASIS 2004XX) until the end of voting for the UBL and WS-R specs and we know if they were approved or not, as numbers are sequentially assigned to approved OASIS Standards. We'll know better by the 1st of November. -Karl Kelvin Lawrence wrote: > > Dear Karl, here is the final version of the formal submission paperwork > for the SAML and REL Token Profiles from the WSS TC. We hope everything > below meets with your approval. Please let us know if there is anything > else that we need to provide. Please let us know what numbers you assign > to the documents so that we may rename the files in accordance with > OASIS naming guidelines. Thanks. > > Respectfully submitted by > Kelvin Lawrence & Chris Kaler > WSS TC Co-Chairs > October 14th 2004 > > 1. A formal specification that is a valid member of its type, > together with appropriate documentation for the specification, both of > which must be written using approved OASIS templates; > > The documents being submitted are in the document repository as follows: > > SAML Token profile: [1] > REL Token profile: [2] > > [1] > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/9347/wss-saml-token-profile-1.0-cd-03.pdf > [2] > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/9381/oasis-____-wss-REL-token-profile-1.0-draft09-cd.pdf > > > 2. A clear English-language summary of the specification; > The two documents are token profiles of WS-Security that show how to use > the core WS-Security 2004 specification in conjunction with SAML and > rights expression languages (REL). > > 3. A statement regarding the relationship of this specification > to similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing > organizations; > These documents are further profiles of WS-Security. They relate to the > work of the WSS TC and also to the work of the SSTC (for SAML). > > 4. Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations > that they are successfully using the specification consistently with the > OASIS IPR Policy; > > For the SAML Token Profile > 1. Westbridge Technology > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00016.html > 2. Sun Microsystems > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00015.html > 3. Oracle http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00017.html > 4. BEA http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00023.html > 5. Microsoft: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00026.html > > For the REL Token Profile > 1. ContentGuard > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00021.html > 2. IBM http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00022.html > 3. Microsoft: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200410/msg00025.html > > 5. An account of each of the comments/issues raised during the > public review period, along with its resolution; > No substantive comments were received during the public review period. > Therefore, no actions were necessary > > 6. An account of and results of the voting to approve the approve > the specification as a Committee Draft; > The voting took place at the WSS TC telecon on 21st September 2004. The > vote was unanimous. > The minutes for that meeting are located at the URL below > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200409/msg00081.html > > 7. An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any > earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification, > together with the originating TC's response to each comment; > This is the first attempt to standardize these documents > > 8. A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the > originating TC; > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss-comment/ > > 9. A statement from the chair of the TC certifying that all > members of the TC have been provided with a copy of the OASIS IPR > Policy; and > Members have been provided with a pointer to the policy on multiple > occaisions. A reminder e-mail was sent on 11-Oct 2004 > > 10. Optionally, a pointer to any minority reports submitted by > one or more TC members who did not vote in favor of approving the > Committee Draft, or certification by the chair that no minority reports > exist. > No minority reports have been received. None are expected. > > > > Cheers > Kelvin >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]